Thursday, February 28, 2008

U-T: Schools chief looks back on his tenure

Board voted Tuesday to buy out contract

Source: http://signonsandiego.com/news/education/20080228-9999-1mc28bishop.html

By Bruce Lieberman
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

February 28, 2008

DEL MAR – Tom Bishop, the departing schools chief for the Del Mar Union School District, began yesterday to sift through a decade of work and memories after the school board voted 3-2 on Tuesday to buy out his contract.


Tom Bishop

The outgoing superintendent will leave the district on vacation this Friday and officially resign April 30.

Yesterday, he said he would not criticize the school board's decision. But he said that he probably would have stayed if a majority of trustees wanted him there and that he had no other reasons for wanting to quit.

“The board that hired you is not always the board you have when you leave,” Bishop said. “It doesn't always work well, and my departure is an example of that.”

Bishop, 58, said he was proud of his role in leading the district through a decade of remarkable growth, when the number of schools grew from three to eight and the teaching staff increased from 70 to 250. The district now enrolls about 3,800 students in kindergarten through sixth grade.

“The facilities are top-rate, and especially what goes on in the classrooms is top-rate,” he said.

Bishop will leave the district with a healthy $5 million reserve, equal to 14 percent of the budget. The state requires school districts to keep a 3 percent reserve.

He said yesterday that he hopes trustees use the money to weather the state budget crisis, which is expected to cause a $1 million shortfall in Del Mar Union in 2008-09.

California districts without Del Mar's financial cushion are considering layoffs and program cuts to make ends meet.

On Tuesday night, a divided school board voted to buy out Bishop's contract, which will cost at least $287,000 and likely more than $300,000. Trustees Annette Easton, Katherine White and Steve McDowell, who voted for the buyout, have commanded a political majority on the board since late 2006. They had long criticized Bishop for wielding too much power and not listening to parents.

Bishop's critics have said the superintendent angered parents during school attendance boundary changes in 2002, had formed too close a relationship between the district and its independent parent-run nonprofit foundation, and had not been open enough concerning the sale of the Del Mar Shores school property. It's now in escrow with the city.

Some parents have been angered by district talks to start a Spanish language immersion program – a move they claim has not sufficiently involved parents.

At Tuesday's meeting, a handful of parents said it was time for a change in leadership.

But they were far outnumbered by an angry crowd of parents and teachers Tuesday, some of whom called the buyout a waste of money at a time when the district may ask parents to help offset budget cuts.

“I'm going to have to dig very deep to get the motivation to run that campaign when our school board is willing to throw away hundreds of thousands of dollars on this resignation agreement,” said Janet Pecsar, a parent at Del Mar Hills Elementary School.

Trustee Janet Lamborghini, who joined Linda Crawford in voting against the buyout, said she had “unqualified confidence” in Bishop and that he delivered “one of the best educational programs in the state.”

Bishop began his career more than three decades ago teaching high school government, history and English, and he later taught English in middle school and then the fifth grade. Before coming to Del Mar in 1998, Bishop was a superintendent of the Jamul-Dulzura Union School District for 12 years.

Bishop said he has great affection for the community in Del Mar, and he praised teachers, parents, and trustees for their dedication.

He acknowledged that he upset some parents during a decade of rapid growth and dizzying change that required setting new attendance boundaries – a contentious process in any school district.

“There's no doubt that the boundary adjustment was very divisive,” Bishop said. Easton was elected to the school board during that turmoil.

The district today is settled to the point that people who buy houses have a good idea of where their children will attend school for 20 to 30 years, he said.

Bishop said he has also set high academic expectations for all students. Last year, the district scored 947 on the state's Academic Performance Index, a multifaceted measure of academic achievement that ranges from 200 to 1,000. The district had the highest API score in the county in 2007, and the seventh highest in the state.

As the parent foundation continues to raise money to provide music, art, science and physical education teachers, trustees will struggle with equity issues, Bishop said.

He said he has wanted all schools to be treated equally, but some parents have wanted to donate just to their own campuses. The board allows parents to pay for up to two teaching positions at their child's school.

On Tuesday, Easton said trustees would not comment on the decision to buy out Bishop's contract.

On Friday, the board is scheduled to meet privately to discuss hiring an interim superintendent.



Source: http://signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20080308/news_lz1mc8lets.html

Focusing on Del Mar School District

I am writing to clarify statements I made that were quoted in “Schools chief looks back on his tenure” (Our North County, Feb. 28).

The article implied that I will be less motivated to financially support my district due to Superintendent Tom Bishop's forced resignation and buyout of his contract. Nothing could be further from the truth. I am overflowing with motivation to donate my time and money to my school and district. I have to look no further than my school's outstanding teachers and exceptional programs to find that motivation.

The quote that “I am going to have to dig deep to get the motivation to run such a campaign” referred to a letter-writing campaign focused on our legislators in Sacramento to fight the governor's proposed budget cuts. My next statement to the school board was that I will run that campaign, regardless of how they voted on the resignation, because I believe that I have a voice in government.

I recognize and appreciate the programs that my children enjoy at our school that are not paid for by public funds, and will continue to support those programs. While I respectfully disagree with the school board's decision, I will not let that stop me from supporting my school and district.

JANET PECSAR
Del Mar

I take issue with the newspaper's coverage of the Del Mar Union School District. Specifically, the coverage of the hot lunch proceeds that were diverted, the missing money at Del Mar Hieghts Elementary School and of the recent board meeting accepting Tom Bishop's resignation. Where, for example, were the mention of reprimands that were placed on Bishop? Where were any quotes from anyone supporting the board?

CORINNE HACKBART
Del Mar

Wednesday, February 27, 2008

U-T: Trustees vote to buy out contract of schools chief

By Bruce Lieberman
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

URL: http://signonsandiego.com/news/education/20080227-9999-1m27resign.html

February 27, 2008

DEL MAR – In a move that angered many teachers and parents, a bitterly divided Del Mar school board bought out Superintendent Tom Bishop's contract last night, ending his decade of leadership in the highly regarded elementary district.

The buyout, which will cost the Del Mar Union School District at least $287,000 and likely more than $300,000, ends a rocky relationship between Bishop and trustees Annette Easton, Katherine White and Steve McDowell. The three trustees had continually criticized Bishop on a number of issues since White ad McDowell were elected in fall 2006.

The vote to accept the buyout was 3-2, with trustees Janet Lamborghini and Linda Crawford dissenting.

More than 150 people attended the school board meeting last night, many angrily opposed to the majority vote. The three trustees had little to say, other than to express their desire to take the district in a new direction. Bishop did not attend.

Board President Easton said the board could not speak about personnel issues in public.

“This process has been extremely difficult,” she said. “One of the primary issues I ran on was transparency. . . . Unfortunately, this situation does not allow it.”

Crawford did say Bishop's departure was regrettable.

“Our district is world-class because of Tom Bishop and his staff,” she said. “This is a sad day for me.”

In the past, the board majority had criticized Bishop's management style, saying he was not open enough and did not seek consensus.

However, many teachers and parents said Bishop worked hard to inform them of decisions and enlisted their opinions about how to make schools better.

As a result, the district experienced rapid growth over the past decade, expanding from three to eight campuses while still improving academically. The district is one of the highest performing in the state.

Many speakers said the board's decision was reckless at a time when state budget cuts are looming.

“As we sit at the edge of near certain financial turmoil, I'm concerned that the board is fixing something that clearly isn't broken,” teacher Jennifer Jo Mokiao said.

According to the resignation agreement, the district will pay Bishop $287,851.86, equal to 18 months' salary.

The district also will pay health benefits through Oct. 31, 2009 – unless Bishop is hired elsewhere.

Other provisions allow Bishop to:

  • Keep his district cell phone and laptop computer.
  • Receive up to $10,000 for any attorney fees he incurred during negotiations to resign.
  • Be paid for 3.6 days of vacation accrued between Feb. 29 and April 30.

February Regular Board Meeting

February 27 Regular Board Meeting

Tuesday, February 26, 2008

Closed Meeting - Superintendent Discipline/Dismissal/Release

Official Agenda, Special School Board Meeting • February 26, 2008

Call To Order - Open Session - 5:00 pm

Business To Be Transacted Will Be Limited To The Following:

  1. Approval of Agenda
  2. Public Comment

Adjourn To Closed Session
(In the Del Mar Hills Academy – Administration Office Conference Room, 14085 Mango Drive, Del Mar, CA 92014)

Closed Session Agenda:

  1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release Pursuant To Government Code 54957

Adjourn To Open Session

Reconvene To Open Session (Anticipated Start Time is 6:00 pm)

  1. Report Of Action Taken In Closed Session

Persons wishing to address the board on Item “E” are invited to do so at this time. If you wish to speak, complete a “Speaker Slip” at the sign-in desk and present it to the secretary of the board.

  1. Personnel - Resignation Agreement Between Del Mar Union School District And Thomas F. Bishop
  2. Adjournment Of Special Board Meeting Of February 26, 2008.

More information:

Monday, February 25, 2008

URGENT SCHOOL NEWS e-mail received

This unsigned email, disseminated by room parents of children in the Del Mar schools, made the rounds the day before the special board meeting approving Tom Bishop's resignation agreement.


Subject: URGENT SCHOOL NEWS

Dear Friends and Neighbors:

Many of you may remember the hard fought, gut wrenching days of the DMUSD School Board boundary decision back in 2002. Others of you may not have even lived here at that time. Then again, some of you went so far as to sell your home(s) and purchase another one just to be able to attend a certain school.. Prior to 2002, there were no school boundaries in the Del Mar district.. You could live on the beach in Del Mar, and send your kids to Ashley Falls or whatever DMUSD school you so desired. When the boundaries were enacted, that created neighborhood schools. That has been the status quo since 2002.

Unfortunately, now, the "newly elected majority of 3" has decided that they don't want the boundaries anymore. In order to do away with them, they are voting on Wednesday, February 27, 2008, at their regular meeting to be held at Del Mar Hills school to allow permanent interdistrict transfers for any student who desires one. They are doing this against the advice of their own legal counsel. Their lawyer wrote a 4 page opinion letter on why this should not be done. However, they are going to do it anyway. This vote is not being publicized, however, you can download the meeting agenda from the website, hopefully, by this weekend.

What is appalling about this vote for permanent transfers to school sites other than the child's neighborhood school, is that it will effectively increase the class sizes in the upper grades. Right now, in the 6th grade at my son's school (Ashley Falls), there are at least 7 students who should be at other schools, but they were granted transfers to Ashley Falls. This makes my son's 6th grade homeroom class a 27 member class, instead of 20. Three of the transfer kids are supposed to go to the newer school, Sycamore Ridge (they can walk there), but the kids didn't like that school, and wanted to come to Ashley Falls. Voila! A transfer was granted! So, with those children at Ashley Falls, our class size is high (27), and the Sycamore Ridge 6th grade class has only 19 kids. You might be asking, (since my child will be graduating the school in June), why do I care? I care about my property values! That's why! Think about what a permanent lifetime transfer could mean! With "out of boundary" kids taking up desks at your home school, there will not always be room for the kids who live near the school to be enrolled. (This was one of the school district's lawyer's admonishments advising against the practice of permanent transfers!)

That was the problem we faced back in 2001 -2002, when my 6th grader was in Kindergarten! So, here we go again, unless lots of people attend that meeting and speak out against enacting a new policy! Please help if you can! Those crazies are doing whatever they please! In fact, they are firing Tom Bishop, the Superintendent for the last 10-11 years on Tuesday night...Why would you force someone to resign and have to pay out the balance of a contract for two more years, and pay big bucks to hire a new person, when the state is in such a horrible budget crunch? Even if you hate Tom Bishop, it doesn't make sense to cut him loose until the contract ends, right? Check out the website for "Special meeting" Board Agendas! You'll see that they are forcing him to resign this coming Tuesday at a "Special Board Meeting" at 6pm at the Del Mar Hills School. They are doing all of this under cover, since no one ever goes to the website to browse about what the Board might be up to....Get the word out if you care! EMAIL THE BOARD MEMBERS IF YOU CAN'T ATTEND THE WEDNESDAY NIGHT MEETING! THEIR EMAIL ADDRESSES CAN BE FOUND AT DMUSD.ORG

We need our boundaries, and we need the transfer policy to be kept on a "space available" "one year at a time" basis.

Thanks so much!

Saturday, February 23, 2008

U-T: School district superintendent might be leaving

By Bruce Lieberman
UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

Source: http://signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20080223-9999-1mc23supe.html

February 23, 2008

Tom Bishop, superintendent of the Del Mar School District since 1998, is poised to resign.

Late yesterday, the school board scheduled a meeting for 5 p.m. Tuesday to approve a resignation agreement between Bishop and the district. The meeting is scheduled at Del Mar Hills Academy, 14085 Mango Drive. A closed session is scheduled first, followed by a public session anticipated for 6 p.m.

The school district announced the meeting at about 5 p.m. yesterday.

Bishop has had a rocky relationship with the school board since late 2006, when trustees Katherine White and Steven McDowell joined Annette Easton to form a board majority.

The three trustees have been highly critical of Bishop's leadership on a number of issues. Their chief complaint after taking office in late 2006 was that the previous school board had handed Bishop too much power and wasn't aggressive enough in exercising its own responsibilities in governing the district.

White, who did not return telephone calls late yesterday, hinted from the get-go that the new board majority might force Bishop out.

“We want a return of power to the board,” she said in an interview for a Dec. 27, 2006 news story. If Bishop could make the transition, he would be “comfortable,” she said. “If he doesn't, we always have the option of buying out his contract.”

The terms of the resignation agreement were not made public, and none of the board members or Bishop returned telephone calls yesterday.

The past year has been a tumultuous one on the board. Several meetings were tense with discussions over the district's parent foundation, which had been criticized in the past for not being transparent enough and paying its former executive director too much money.

The board majority criticized Bishop's involvement in helping the foundation raise money, and last spring voted on measures to sever several ties between the district and the foundation. Its director has since left and hasn't been replaced.

White, Easton and McDowell have all said in the past that the district should have sought more community input on the sale of the Del Mar Shores school property, which is in escrow with the city of Del Mar. An agreement between the city and district would preserve open space for public use.

Despite the controversies, the eight-campus Del Mar School District is one of the highest performing public school districts in the state.

Home to about 3,800 students in kindergarten through sixth grade, Del Mar scored 947 last year on the state's Academic Performance Index, a measure of academic performance that includes scores on state standardized exams and several other measures. An API score ranges between 200 and 1,000, and the state encourages districts to shoot for a score of 800.

In 2001, the district's school board at that time nominated Bishop as the California superintendent of the year.

Wednesday, February 20, 2008

Closed Meeting - Superintendent Discipline/Dismissal/Release

Official Agenda, Special School Board Meeting • February 20, 2008

Call To Order - Open Session - 3:30pm

Business To Be Transacted Will Be Limited To The Following:

  1. Approval of Agenda
  2. Public Comment

Adjourn To Closed Session

Closed Session Agenda:

  1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release Pursuant To Government Code 54957

Adjourn To Open Session

Reconvene To Open Session

  1. Report Of Action Taken In Closed Session
  2. Adjournment Of Special Board Meeting Of February 20, 2008.

More information:

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Voice of SD: Del Mar’s Missing Money, Mysterious Politics

Source: http://voiceofsandiego.org/articles/2008/02/19/opinion/01merge021908.txt

By Ian S. Port

Tuesday, Feb. 19, 2008

Sometime in the middle of January, an envelope containing about $8,000 in cash and personal checks disappeared from a drawer at Del Mar Heights Elementary School.

The money was proceeds from a book fair the school held in December to raise money for new library books — and no one knows what happened to it. The locked drawer where it was kept showed no signs of forced entry. The money didn’t turn up in a massive search of the school office.

Days after the envelope was discovered missing, the police were called. They have no leads.

The incident is obviously embarrassing for the staff of the school, members of which admit that they broke with district policy by not keeping the money in the school safe when it wasn’t being counted.

"Mistakes were made," said Heights Principal Wendy Wardlow. "There should have been better oversight."

The errors were magnified by a news story about the missing money appeared in The San Diego Union-Tribune. In a short Feb. 8 piece, Wardlow was quoted as being regretful and Superintendent Tom Bishop as disappointed -- with him also noting the amount of the loss as unprecedented.

Everyone acknowledges that losing track of over $8,000 is a pretty big bungle.

But the appearance of a story about the missing funds in the Union-Tribune has raised the suspicions of many in the Del Mar Heights community, who wonder if the story was pushed to the Union-Tribune by someone in the district who might not mind seeing the school embarrassed in the region’s biggest paper.

True or not, such paranoia is commonplace in the district these days. While schools in Del Mar manage to produce some of the highest test scores in San Diego County -- and absolute adoration from many parents -- the politics of education in this affluent and successful community are frequently vicious, vindictive and sometimes nearly violent.

The U-T story raised eyebrows partly because the paper writes barely at all about mid-coastal elementary schools. Besides fluffy features, the only hard news that makes it to print is truly major: bond measures, board elections and major curricular crisis.

Moreover, the story was published before many in the district -- even many of those on staff at Del Mar Heights School -- had heard about the missing money, leaving a very limited pool of potential leakers.

After Superintendent Tom Bishop was informed of the missing funds on Jan. 24, he issued a gag order for everyone who knew of the incident, including staff and the school board.

Two weeks later, the story appeared.

Burglaries, thefts, narcotics violations, vandalism and other crimes are regularly reported at schools in the area, so it’s hard to see why this report would stand out. According to the crime-mapping website Arjis.org, at least five similar crimes were reported at DMUSD schools between November and January. Does the U-T check them all out, or did something else draw the paper’s attention to that January incident at Del Mar Heights?

School board member Katherine White said the circumstances -- the leak of an embarrassing story when only a few knew about it -- "are something."

"I didn’t read about it in the paper when there was a principal drunk in a school event," White said. "And I didn’t read in the paper when a school employee was using drugs on campus. And I don’t read about the principal that screams at his employees. And I don’t read about the other thefts that have happened in the schools this year ... I don’t understand what makes this such a reportable event when those other things I’ve never even been officially told about."

The view of the Heights School as a target of the district administration -- specifically Superintendent Tom Bishop -- is widely (though not universally) held among the school’s parents and staff.

None that I contacted would speak for attribution on the subject, but the story they tell is the same. Critics from all over the district have long said that Bishop does not tolerate disagreement from employees. And Wardlow, the Heights principal, has earned a reputation as a straight-talker.

"He hates Wendy and he hates the Heights and he’s been trying to get rid of her for years," one parent said. "And why is that? Because Wendy speaks what she thinks. She’s not diplomatic."

Bishop told me he was "disappointed" about the missing money. He did not return calls Friday seeking further comment.

The spat between Bishop at the Heights has old origins, according to those who describe it, but the conflict has heightened recently. In 2006, a brand new, three-person school board majority was elected on a message of reform, implicitly criticizing the superintendent and a school board that they said had long given him everything he wanted. Their election came amid a mass evaporation of faith in various divisions of the district, especially in the nonprofit foundation that supports Del Mar classes with private money. Many of the most vocal supporters of the "slate of three" reformers were Heights parents. Two of the new school board members sent their kids to the school.

Since the election, the Superintendent’s professional life has been significantly less predictable. Board meetings are no longer smile-a-thons held to ratify Bishop’s desires. When oddities occur -- and there have been too many to list here -- Bishop is brought into line by his board.

Last year, parents from another DMUSD school nearly erupted into a fistfight over the district’s plan to start a pilot Spanish immersion program, partly because the district didn’t bother to tell parents of its plans until after the decision to go ahead was made. The principal of the school herself learned of the immersion program minutes before the school board voted to approve it. But after parents revolted -- complaining that no one told them what was going on -- the plan had to be canceled.

Two months later, Heights Principal Wardlow appeared in front of the school board asking to start a different Spanish language program at the school. Her proposal for a smaller program was developed entirely by the school staff and had its support.

Despite that adding foreign language education has been a longtime stated goal of the district -- and that the Heights curriculum was an obvious chance to atone for the blundering of the earlier immersion program -- Bishop and an ally on the board rode Wardlow through a two-hour hearing on the proposal, bringing to bear their full arsenal of nitpicking on the principal.

The message was clear: the district can do what it wants, and it might mess things up horribly. But even an obviously competent and heavily supported proposal from the Heights is going to get the toughest scrutiny from the district.

One wound between the Heights and the district goes to the very existence of the school itself. Rumors have persisted for years -- heard by teachers and school board members -- that Bishop has plans to close the Heights, sell the extremely valuable land it sits on, and use the money to build a new district office.

The superintendent always denies this. Of course, Heights parents and staff still find such talk incredibly disturbing. And in other matters, not a lot of love rains down from the district to dissuade parents and staff of the notion that their school is looked upon less than favorably by it.

The very thing that allegedly pits Wardlow against Bishop -- her forthrightness -- is what many parents say they like most about her.

"Wendy Wardlow has all of my tremendous support, as well as everybody in the community that I’ve ever talked to," said parent Ralph DeMarco, who sent five kids through various Del Mar schools, and says he likes Wardlow the best of any principal. When DeMarco heard about the missing $8,107.18 in book fair funds, "I went over there and I said I want to write you a check right now."

With a tone of suspicion that has become all-too-common around Del Mar schools lately, he admitted finding the U-T piece a bit weird.

"Is that somebody’s PR plan there? Why this article like that? Is somebody feeding that for the purpose of their overall agenda?" he asked.

It could be nothing. But in Del Mar these days, you just never know.

Ian S. Port is assistant editor of the Rancho Santa Fe Review, Carmel Valley News and Del Mar Village Voice. Contact him at iansmithport@gmail.com. Or send a letter to the editor.


Ian S. Port

Thursday, February 14, 2008

CV News Article: Police investigating possible embezzlement in Del Mar Heights funds’ disappearance

Source: http://sdranchcoastnews.com/CMV%20Pages/CMV_TP2.html

By Ian S. Port
Assistant Editor

More than $8,000 in proceeds from a book fair went missing at Del Mar Heights School last month — an incident that San Diego Police are investigating as possible embezzlement or theft.

An envelope containing the missing funds — $8,701.18 in personal checks and cash — disappeared from the desk drawer of an office assistant the week of Jan. 23, according to Heights Principal Wendy Wardlow. The envelope contained proceeds from a book sale, including about $5,400 that the school still owes to Scholastic, Inc. There was no sign of forced access to the drawer.

“There should have been better oversight, and mistakes were made,” Wardlow said. “We just can’t imagine that anyone would take something like this.”

After a district investigation failed to recover the missing envelope, San Diego Police were notified and are now investigating the matter, according to spokesperson Monica Munoz. She said the detective working the case has “no leads.”

“We truly aren't sure what this is: theft, loss or embezzlement,” Munoz stated in an e-mail. “All we know is there was several thousand dollars in a desk, and when the secretary went to retrieve the money it was gone. We know it was not a burglary.”

Del Mar Union School District Superintendent Tom Bishop said he was “disappointed” at the loss.

“It’s kind of a sad story for us,” Bishop said.

He said administrators are trying to file insurance claims for some of the lost money, but said it would be a month before they would be answered.

Wardlow said the envelope with the money went into the locked drawer Dec. 20, the last day before the school’s winter break. It was removed, partially counted and returned to the drawer by an office assistant Jan. 7.

District policy dictates that the money be stored in a safe. But Wardlow said the Del Mar Heights safe was not in a place where the assistant could count it, so she temporarily kept it in a desk drawer.

Bishop said he was told of the missing funds after Heights staff spent days searching for the envelope. He called San Diego Police to the incident Jan. 25.

So far, none of the missing checks have been cashed. Wardlow said she hopes the money may simply turn up missing. But if it doesn’t, she said, students won’t feel the error.

“It will not come out of anything that will go to our children,” she said.

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

Closed Meeting - Superintendent Discipline/Dismissal/Release

Official Agenda, Special School Board Meeting • February 13, 2008

Call To Order - Open Session - 6:00

Business To Be Transacted Will Be Limited To The Following:

  1. Approval of Agenda
  2. Public Comment

Adjourn To Closed Session

Closed Session Agenda:

  1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release Pursuant To Government Code 54957

Adjourn To Open Session

Reconvene To Open Session

  1. Report Of Action Taken In Closed Session
  2. Adjournment Of Special Board Meeting Of February 13, 2008.

More information:

Friday, February 8, 2008

U-T: School's book fair proceeds missing

Police are looking for more than $8,000

By Bruce Lieberman

UNION-TRIBUNE STAFF WRITER

Source: http://signonsandiego.com/news/northcounty/20080208-9999-1mi8theft.html

February 8, 2008

DEL MAR – More than $8,000 raised from a book fair in late December at Del Mar Heights Elementary School is missing, and police are investigating the incident as a possible embezzlement.

School officials discovered the money was missing Jan. 18 after checking a locked drawer in the school office, where an employee had stored the money in an envelope, Principal Wendy Wardlow said.

Nothing indicated the drawer had been forced open, she said.

The money should have been placed in a safe at the school, Wardlow said.

“I think in the busyness of things that a mistake was made,” she said.

The lost money totaled $8,107 – mostly in cash but also personal checks, Del Mar Union School District Superintendent Tom Bishop said. As of yesterday afternoon, neither the school nor the district office had notified parents of the theft.

“At first the (school) site had a hard time believing the money was gone, and then as we finally concluded that it was gone, this was on our list of things to do and we're finally getting around to it,” Bishop said.

The district planned to notify parents today, he said.

The case is being investigated by the San Diego Police Department's northwest division, said Gary Hassen, a department spokesman.

The school hosted the book fair in late December to raise money for new library books, Wardlow said. The educational company Scholastic sold books at the fair, and was to split money raised with the school. Wardlow said the school owed Scholastic about $5,000 of the $8,107 raised.

The school district has contacted its insurance company to cover the loss, but a settlement was still uncertain yesterday, Bishop said.

The loss of so much money from a school fundraiser is unprecedented in the district, he said.

To safeguard valuables at each school, the district installed safes on every campus about a year and a half ago, Bishop said.

“The safes are there to prevent episodes like this, so it's disappointing that this money is gone,” Bishop said.

Wardlow said she has reviewed with her staff the procedures for handling money.

“It's a very, very marvelous school, and every single person at this school is ethical and honorable,” Wardlow said.

“I certainly don't have a lack of confidence in any person at this school, (and) I don't think that there was ever any intent to be negligent.”


Bruce Lieberman: (760) 476-8205; bruce.lieberman@uniontrib.com

Wednesday, February 6, 2008

Closed Meeting - Superintendent Discipline/Dismissal/Release

Official Agenda, Special School Board Meeting • February 6, 2008

Call To Order - Open Session - 5:00 pm

Business To Be Transacted Will Be Limited To The Following:

  1. Approval of Agenda
  2. Public Comment

Adjourn To Closed Session

Closed Session Agenda:

  1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release Pursuant To Government Code 54957

Adjourn To Open Session

Reconvene To Open Session

  1. Report Of Action Taken In Closed Session
  2. Adjournment Of Special Board Meeting Of February 6, 2008.

More information:

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Closed Meeting - Superintendent Discipline/Dismissal/Release

Official Agenda, Special School Board Meeting • January 30, 2008

Call To Order - Open Session - 6:00 pm

Business To Be Transacted Will Be Limited To The Following:

  1. Approval of Agenda
  2. Public Comment

Adjourn To Closed Session

Closed Session Agenda:

  1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release Pursuant To Government Code 54957

Adjourn To Open Session

Reconvene To Open Session

  1. Report Of Action Taken In Closed Session
  2. Adjournment Of Special Board Meeting Of January 30, 2008.

More information:

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Bishop Learns of The Missing Funds

Tom Bishop is informed of the missing Book Fair funds at Del Mar Heights school.

After an unsuccessful search for the money, Tom Bishop issues a gag order to all district personnel.

Source: Voice of San Diego, 2-19-08

Wednesday, January 23, 2008

January Regular Board Meeting

January 23rd Regular Board Meeting

Friday, January 18, 2008

Book Fair Money Discovered Missing

The proceeds from the Del Mar Heights book fair are discovered missing from the desk drawer they were stored in.

Source: Union Tribune Article 2-8-08

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

Closed Meeting - Superintendent Employment Evaluation

Official Agenda, Special School Board and Visitation Meeting • January 16, 2008

Business To Be Transacted Will Be Limited To The Following:
Call To Order Open Session - 12:45 p.m.

  1. Public Input
  2. Visitation to Del Mar Heights and Observation of Professional
    Learning Community practices.

Adjourn To Closed Session
(In the Del Mar Heights – Administration Office Conference
13555 Boquita Drive, Del Mar, CA 92014.)

Call To Order - Closed Session - 2:30 p.m.

Closed Session Agenda:

  1. Public Employment: Employment Evaluation (G.C. 54957)
    Title: Superintendent

Reconvene To Open Session

  1. Report Of Action Taken In Closed Session
  2. Adjournment

More information:

Monday, January 7, 2008

School Resumes

School resumes for all DMUSD students after the Christmas break.

At Del Mar Heights, the book fair money is removed from the drawer, partially counted, and returned to the drawer./p>

Source: Carmel Valley News 2-14-08

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Book Fair Money Handling

The proceeds from the Book Fair, cash and personal checks, is put into an envelope and locked in a desk drawer at the Heights prior to the Christmas break.

Source: Carmel Valley News 02-14-08

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

December Regular Board Meeting - Superintendent Employment Evaluation

Official Agenda, Special Board Meeting • December 12, 2007

CALL TO ORDER - OPEN SESSION – 4:00 pm
BUSINESS TO BE TRANSACTED WILL BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:

  1. Board President Calls For Blue Speaker Slips
  2. Public Input Concerning Items On The Closed Session Agenda

Adjourn To Closed Session
(In the Del Mar Hills Academy Administration Office Conference Room
14085 Mango Drive, Del Mar, CA 92014)

CALL TO ORDER – CLOSED SESSION - 4:00PM

Closed Session Agenda:

  1. Public Employment: Employment Evaluation (G.C.54957)
    Title: Superintendent
  2. Conference With Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (G.C. 54956.9(b))
    Name Of Case: Significant Exposure To Litigation: One Case
  3. Conference With Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (G.C. 54956.9(a))
    Name Of Case: City Of Del Mar v. Del Mar Union School District
  4. Conference With Labor Negotiator (G.C. 54957.6)
    Agency Designated Representatives: Thomas F. Bishop, Superintendent
    Rodger Smith, Director Of Facilities/Personnel
    Employee Organization: Del Mar California Teacher's Association

Adjourn To Open Session

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

  1. Report Of Action Taken In Closed Session:

CALL TO ORDER – REGULAR MEETING OF DECEMBER 12, 2007 - 5:45 PM

Regular meeting agenda items omitted...

More Information:

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Winterfest, Bookfair, and Blizzard Night at the Heights

Winterfest will begin at 6:30 p.m. in the Pavilion. (Students need to be in their classrooms by 6:00 p.m.) Baked goods and hot beverages will be available for purchase before the performance.

The Book Fair will be open from 5:30 p.m. - 6:20 p.m. After the Winterfest Program, the Book Fair will be open until 8:00 p.m.

DQ Blizzards (for those who pre-ordered) will be available in front of the MUR from 7:20 p.m. - 8:00 p.m.


Book Fair proceeds were $8107. $5400 of that is owed to Scholastic, the balance is to benefit the school library.


Source: Del Mar Heights calendar

Wednesday, September 5, 2007

Closed Meeting: Public Employee Dismissal/Release

Official Agenda, Special Board Meeting • September 5, 2007

CALL TO ORDER - OPEN SESSION – 3:30pm
BUSINESS TO BE TRANSACTED WILL BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:

  1. Approval Of The Agenda
  2. Public Comment

Adjourn To Closed Session

CALL TO ORDER – CLOSED SESSION

Closed Session Agenda:

  1. Public Employee Dismissal/Release Pursuant To Section 54956.95
  2. Public Employee Performance Evaluation Pursuant To Section 54956.95
    Position Title: Classroom Teacher
  3. Conference With Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (G.C. 54956.9(A))
    Name Of Case: Grievance Of DMCTA And Certificated Employee

Adjourn To Open Session

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

  1. Report Of Action Taken In Closed Session:
  2. Technology Leadership Study
  3. Adjournment Of Special Meeting Of September 5, 2007

More Information:

Wednesday, August 29, 2007

August Regular Board Meeting: Public Employment: Employee Exception

Official Agenda, Special Board Meeting • August 29, 2007

CALL TO ORDER - OPEN SESSION – 3:40pm

  1. Board President Calls For Blue Speaker Slips
  2. Public Input Concerning Items On The Closed Session Agenda

Adjourn To Closed Session
(In the Del Mar Hills Academy Administration Office Conference Room
14085 Mango Drive, Del Mar, CA 92014)

CALL TO ORDER – CLOSED SESSION 3:45 - 5:45 PM

Closed Session Agenda:

  1. Conference With Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (G.C. 54956.9(A))
    Name Of Case: Del Mar Union School District v. Wm. G. Kerckhoff Company, et. al.
  2. Conference With Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (G.C. 54956.9(A))
    Name Of Case: City Of Del Mar v. Del Mar Union School District
  3. Conference With Labor Negotiator (G.C. 54957.6)
    Agency Designated Representatives: Thomas F. Bishop, Superintendent
    Rodger Smith, Director Of Facilities/Personnel
    Employee Organization: Del Mar California Teacher's Association
  4. Conference With Labor Negotiator
    Agency Designated Representatives: Thomas F. Bishop, Superintendent
    Rodger Smith, Director Of Facilities/Personnel
    Unrepresented: Certificated Directors, Classified Directors and Classified Management.
  5. Public Employment: Employee Exception (G.C.54957)
  6. Conference With Legal Counsel - Anticipated Litigation (G.C. 54956.9(b))
    Name Of Case: Significant Exposure To Litigation: One Case

Adjourn To Open Session

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

  1. Report Of Action Taken In Closed Session:

CALL TO ORDER – REGULAR MEETING OF AUGUST 29, 2007 - 5:45 PM

Regular meeting agenda items omitted...

More Information:

Wednesday, July 25, 2007

Closed Meeting: Superintendent Employment Evaluation

Official Agenda, Special Board Meeting • July 25, 2007

CALL TO ORDER - OPEN SESSION – 10:25am
BUSINESS TO BE TRANSACTED WILL BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:

  1. Approval Of The Agenda
  2. Public Comment

Adjourn To Closed Session

CALL TO ORDER – CLOSED SESSION

Closed Session Agenda:

  1. Public Employment: Employee Evaluation: Title: Superintendent (G.C.54957)
  2. Conference With Real Property Negotiator (G.C. 54956.8)
    Property: 225 9th Street, Del Mar, California 92014
    Agency Negotiators: Thomas F. Bishop, Superintendent
    Rodger Smith, Director Of Facilities/Personnel
    Negotiating Parties: DMUSD And The City of Del Mar
    Under Negotiation: Sale/Lease Terms Between The City Of Del Mar And The DMUSD.
  3. Conference With Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (G.C. 54956.9(A))
    Name Of Case: Del Mar Union School District v. Wm. G. Kerckhoff Company, et. al.
  4. Conference With Legal Counsel - Existing Litigation (G.C. 54956.9(A))
    Name Of Case: City Of Del Mar v. Del Mar Union School District
  5. Conference With Labor Negotiator (G.C. 54957.6)
    Agency Designated Representatives: Thomas F. Bishop, Superintendent
    Rodger Smith, Director Of Facilities/Personnel
    Employee Organization: Del Mar California Teacher's Association

Adjourn To Open Session

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

  1. Report Of Action Taken In Closed Session:
  2. Adjournment Of Special Meeting Of July 25, 2007

More Information:

Wednesday, June 13, 2007

Closed Meeting: Superintendent Employment Evaluation

Official Agenda, Special Board Meeting • June 13, 2007

CALL TO ORDER - OPEN SESSION – 2:00PM
BUSINESS TO BE TRANSACTED WILL BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:

  1. Approval Of The Agenda
  2. Public Comment

Adjourn To Closed Session

CALL TO ORDER – CLOSED SESSION

Closed Session Agenda:

  1. Public Employee Discipline/Dismissal/Release (G.C.54957)
  2. Conference with Labor Negotiator (G.C. 54957.6)
    Agency Designated Representatives: Tom Bishop, Superintendent and Rodger Smith, Director of Personnel and Facilities;
    Employee Organization: Del Mar California Teachers Association

Adjourn To Open Session

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

  1. Board Workshop On 2007/2008 District Budget
  2. Public Comment

Adjourn To Closed Session

RECONVENE TO CLOSED SESSION

  1. Public Employment: Employee Evaluation: Title: Superintendent (G.C.54957)

Adjourn To Open Session

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

  1. Report Of Action Taken In Closed Session
  2. Adjournment Of Special Board Meeting Of June 13, 2007

More Information:

Friday, June 8, 2007

Closed Meeting - Superintendent Employment Evaluation

Official Agenda, Special Board Meeting • June 8, 2007

CALL TO ORDER - OPEN SESSION – 1:00pm
BUSINESS TO BE TRANSACTED WILL BE LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING:

  1. Approval Of The Agenda
  2. Public Comment
  3. Process For Short/Long Term Planning
  4. Approval Contract With LeadershipDNA

Adjourn To Closed Session

CALL TO ORDER – CLOSED SESSION

Closed Session Agenda:

  1. Public Employment: Employee Evaluation: Title: Superintendent (G.C.54957)

Adjourn To Open Session

RECONVENE TO OPEN SESSION

  1. Report Of Action Taken In Closed Session:
  2. Adjournment

More Information:

Friday, November 10, 2006

U-T: Trustees set to tackle problems

Some want board to take the lead

By Sherry Saavedra
STAFF WRITER

Source: http://signonsandiego.com/uniontrib/20061110/news_1mi10delmar.html

November 10, 2006

DEL MAR – A slate of trustees critical of Del Mar Union's administration is preparing to take office as the school district wrestles with a number of weighty issues.

The trio, a new board majority, have expressed concerns with the negotiations over the sale of the district office property, the embattled parent foundation's finances and the role of the superintendent. How they handle those issues will shape their four years in office.

Incumbent Annette Easton, and challengers Steven McDowell, former Del Mar Heights Elementary PTA treasurer, and Del Mar Heights PTA president Katherine White were elected to office Tuesday. They are to be sworn in on Dec. 13.

McDowell and White ousted board President Barbara Myers and beat Martha Murphy, a foundation board member running with Myers.

The district serves 3,800 kindergarten-through-sixth-grade students in seven elementary schools.

A key campaign issue was the role of Superintendent Tom Bishop. The winning slate argued the board had ceded its power to the superintendent.

“We want a return of power to the board,” White said. “The board reports to the constituency. The superintendent reports to the board, and the superintendent can't be making unilateral decisions and talking about things like school closures or things that require a board vote.”

If Bishop can make the transition, he'll be “comfortable,” she said.

“If he doesn't, we always have the option of buying out his contract,” White said.

Easton said if the board reasserts its lead role in setting strategy and policy, trustees can expect to have a good working relationship with the superintendent. And buying out Bishop's contract is not under consideration now, she said. McDowell echoed Easton's position.

An issue that has divided the community is negotiations over the sale of the 5-acre district office property on Ninth Street and Camino Del Mar. Selling the surplus land would generate money to renovate the outdated district office building or pay for a new one elsewhere.

The city of Del Mar, which wants to purchase at least the portion of the property that includes playing fields and a private school, sued the district following disagreements over price. Then Elise Kerckhoff, the niece of William Kerckhoff, whose development corporation gave the land to the district, filed suit against Del Mar Union. Kerckhoff alleges the district is disregarding the purpose of the gift, which was that the land be designated for school uses.

The incoming slate has been critical of the handling of this matter.

Easton said the board should seek community input and evaluate whether it's on the right path. White and McDowell said residents needs to be better informed on how decisions have been made.

“It would be nice to hear from the law firm that's representing us and find out why they think we're right,” White said. “One of the things that a lot of people have said about this is that so much of it was hidden in secrecy. I think we don't need to spend as much time in closed-door sessions.”

Another issue that will come before the board is the Del Mar Schools Education Foundation. The district's fundraising organization has been under fire for not being transparent enough, ignoring parent concerns, and spending too much on overhead including $115,000 on an executive director's salary.

The foundation raises money for one-third of the salaries of the district's art, music, technology and science teachers.

Four foundation board members recently resigned, and the foundation's leadership, which disputes allegations of mismanagement, has decided to seek an independent review to reassure parents.

McDowell said he would like to meet with foundation board members and others to gain a better understanding from both sides.

Easton wants to re-evaluate how the district and the foundation operate together. She also said the board should take the lead in repairing community divisions caused by the controversy.

White said the board should vote on whether the district should continue to subsidize the foundation, which it does through donated classroom space, the partial payment of a foundation employee and other assistance worth about $55,000. That subsidy gives the school board oversight responsibility, she said, and the board also has the right to withdraw that support.

The positions of the winning slate, particularly those pertaining to the superintendent's role, have alarmed other trustees. Trustee Janet Lamborghini raves about Bishop.

“Tom is an extraordinary superintendent who has brought us a lot of what this slate doesn't think we have enough of like transparency, planning ahead, and setting explicit goals and objectives,” she said. “He's brought many improvements to the curriculum, and the proof is that our test scores keep going up.”

Lamborghini hopes once the board newcomers learn more about how a district is run, they'll do a turnaround.

Trustee Linda Crawford said Bishop has an impressive countywide and statewide following in the education community.

“He's an extremely intelligent, articulate man who is very valuable in the education community,” she said.


Thursday, April 27, 2006

Judge agrees with auditors

Source: Union Tribune

No higher pensions for ex-school officials

By Chris Moran
STAFF WRITER
April 27, 2006

SAN YSIDRO – The $15,000 raises two San Ysidro school administrators got just weeks before their retirement in 2002 do not qualify them for higher publicly funded pensions, an administrative law judge has ruled.

The judge agreed with retirement system auditors who found that the San Ysidro school board gave the raises to boost the pensions of former assistant superintendents Christine Aranda and Alice De La Torre. That is an illegal practice known as spiking.

Aranda and De La Torre requested a hearing, which was in September, to challenge the audit by the California State Teachers' Retirement System. The judge issued a decision this month, and the ruling must go to the CalSTRS board for approval. That probably will happen in June, an agency spokeswoman said.

In 2004, CalSTRS put a stop to the higher retirement payments and put Aranda and De La Torre on installment plans to repay the surplus pension money they had received. Neither they nor the San Ysidro School District face additional sanctions.

CalSTRS did not dispute the legality of the raises. It found only that those raises should not be used in calculating retirement benefits.

De La Torre and Aranda both said they had not yet decided whether to continue contesting the issue.

The case began in June 2002. It was then that the board increased the salaries of Aranda and De La Torre from $104,494 to $120,000 a year, retroactive to the previous July.

The San Ysidro district gave CalSTRS two reasons for the raises: to recognize Aranda and De La Torre's increased workload under an inexperienced superintendent and to persuade them not to retire.

The incentive didn't work. De La Torre retired three weeks after the raise and Aranda retired six weeks after the board's action. Their replacements were given $106,000 salaries.

The board fired Superintendent Jose Torres the same day it gave the raises to Aranda and De La Torre.

The state teachers' retirement fund accrues through contributions from employees, school districts, the state general fund and investment earnings.

Each retiree's age, years of employment and highest salary figures into the retirement benefits. CalSTRS calculated that the last-minute raises added $1,189 to De La Torre's monthly pension check and $869 to Aranda's, an increase that was estimated to add up to nearly $300,000 combined over their lifetimes.

In her proposed decision, Administrative Law Judge Vallera Johnson recapped that Aranda and De La Torre took on extra work, such as teacher union negotiations, a task generally handled by the superintendent.

The current San Ysidro board spent $72,000 in legal fees on the case before dropping its opposition to the CalSTRS findings. Aranda and De La Torre then hired their own attorney to represent them in a hearing in September.

Both are still active in South County, Aranda as a trustee on the board of Southwestern College and De La Torre with several volunteer organizations.

Saturday, August 13, 2005

Audit finds 2 pensions were hiked

School administrators given illegal boost, challenge says

Source: San Diego Union Tribune>
By Chris Moran
STAFF WRITER

August 13, 2005

SAN YSIDRO – The San Ysidro school board illegally jacked up the publicly funded pensions of two administrators by more than $10,000 a year each as they retired in 2002, auditors have found.

The California State Teachers' Retirement System is challenging the pension increases to former associate superintendents Christine Aranda and Alice De La Torre. Within weeks of their retirements, the San Ysidro board gave retroactive raises that boosted their annual pay by more than $15,000 each.

Aranda's retirement benefits increased by $869 a month as a result of the raise she got six weeks before retiring as San Ysidro's associate superintendent of educational services, according to a CalSTRS document calling for a reversal of the pension increase. Aranda is now board president of Southwestern College.

De La Torre's monthly pension check went up by $1,189 because of the raise she got three weeks before she retired as associate superintendent of human resources, according to the same CalSTRS document.

CalSTRS does not object to the salary raises themselves but claims the school board granted the raises for the purpose of inflating De La Torre's and Aranda's pensions. That practice, which CalSTRS calls "spiking," is prohibited by state law.

CalSTRS found that retirements so soon after the raises and the board's replacement of Aranda and De La Torre with assistant superintendents at lower salaries were proof that the board was spiking their pensions.

Aranda had no comment on the case. De La Torre could not be reached for comment.

CalSTRS is a retirement fund for teachers of kindergarten through community college. It's funded by contributions from public school teachers and administrators, their school district employers, state general fund money and interest earnings.

Retirees' benefits are based in part on the highest salaries they earned. CalSTRS estimates that if the last-minute raises are figured in, Aranda and De La Torre would, between them, receive nearly $300,000 more in pension payments over their lifetimes than they would if the raises were excluded from the calculations.

The current San Ysidro board, after having spent $72,000 in legal fees on the case, has voted not to contest CalSTRS in next month's hearing before an administrative law judge to decide whether Aranda and De La Torre get to keep the increased pension benefits. Aranda and De La Torre have hired an attorney.

Last year, CalSTRS put the retired administrators on an installment plan to repay the extra pension benefits they had already received, said Wendy Tucker, the attorney who represented San Ysidro until the district pulled out of the case.

The case arises from a particularly turbulent era in the 5,100-student district with an annual budget of $39 million.

An account from documents obtained by The San Diego Union-Tribune through a public records request show that in early 2002 Aranda and De La Torre felt they were working in a hostile work environment.

Dr. Jose Torres had been hired as superintendent in November 2001 and barred Aranda and De La Torre from attending some meetings and "went so far as to publicly humiliate and demean them," according to the district's response to the CalSTRS audit findings.

Because of Torres' inexperience, his "disruptive" impact on employees and his conflict with the board, Aranda and De La Torre carried a heavier load than they had under his predecessor, the 13-page response states. The duties included labor negotiations with teachers who came close to striking in February 2002.

On June 8, 2002, the board fired Torres. At that same meeting, by a vote of 3-1 with one abstention, it changed the titles of Aranda and De La Torre from assistant superintendent to associate superintendent and each got an annual raise of $15,506, retroactive to July 1, 2001.

The raises were approved in part as an incentive to keep Aranda and De La Torre working for the district.

It didn't work. Aranda retired six weeks later, including a three-week stint as interim superintendent. De La Torre retired three weeks after she received her retroactive raise. They both retired at annual salaries of $120,000.

CalSTRS would not release information on the retirees' total retirement compensation, only the amount at stake. But retirees with decades of experience often receive pensions nearly as great as their highest salaries.

Trustees Jean Romero and Yolanda Hernandez, the only trustees still on the five-member San Ysidro board from three years ago, both said that the district's attorney said the raises were legal and that they were not granted to boost retirement pay.

Romero was the only trustee to vote against the raises, "because it didn't feel right," she said. Romero said the board shouldn't have been doling out hefty pay raises in a crisis atmosphere. Rather, she said, raises should have been tied to achievement, as in the case of Grace Kojima, who retired as superintendent in 2001 and came back to serve as interim superintendent for several months in 2002.

Hernandez said she not only believes Aranda and De La Torre deserved the raises but also that they should keep the pension increases even though the district has withdrawn from the case.

"They're very valuable and they helped the district a lot, especially in those difficult times," Hernandez said.

A spokeswoman for CalSTRS would not comment on why San Ysidro was audited. She said audits are regularly scheduled but can also occur as a result of tips or because of red flags, such as dramatic salary changes.

Wednesday, October 28, 1998

Growth at center of debate in Del Mar school board race

Chris Moran
The San Diego Union - Tribune
Oct 28, 1998. pg. B.1

DEL MAR -- If test scores like this could be bottled and sold, the demand would make the Del Mar Union School District the second coming of Coca-Cola.

Del Mar's 2,130 students on average are doing better on standardized tests than about 80 percent of their peers nationally, in some cases better than 90 percent.

The good schools may never have been a secret, but now they're a certifiable craze. People are flocking to half-million-dollar homes in Carmel Valley in part to send their kids to the schools. Enrollment at the district's fourth school, full before it even opened in September, soared by 100 students in four months.

That's the curse of success, and it figures to be the major issue in November's school board election.

There's no discontent about the way things are going, just an undercurrent of apprehension about the way things might be. Growth has caused so much tension that when a parent suggested at a board meeting last year that the district wasn't doing enough to manage it, the superintendent responded by threatening to sue for defamation.

The superintendent, Robert Harriman, is gone for reasons that neither he nor the district have ever fully disclosed. He resigned as part of a settlement that will pay him as much as $166,420.

The parent, Sonja Erion, 41, is one of six candidates for three seats in the November school board election. Others are incumbent Mindy Disraeli, 40, lobbyist Jim Lantry, 45, parent Barbara Myers, 47, teacher David Smiley, 49, and incumbent board president Jeanne Waite, 47.

Growth has so overwhelmed the district that children from new homes are being bused to older schools, shut out by overcrowding at their neighborhood schools.

"There's a certain lack of stability when you're expanding at that rate," Erion said.

And from Erion's perspective, her children could be making friends at Del Mar Heights School only to lose them when they get transferred east as slots open in schools on the other side of Interstate 5.

"By drawing (attendance) boundaries in a different way, perhaps we could generate some amount of stability," Erion said. "I don't know if that's possible."

Erion said her credentials for a school board position include her years of volunteering in the schools and her willingness to speak up for change.

Challenger Jim Lantry also questioned the district's management of growth. He said when he moved to Harwick Lane in Carmel Valley, children on his block attended three different schools. He decried the busing of children from his neighborhood to the other side of I- 5.

"Funds that should be going to teaching our children will be used to transport them out of their neighborhoods instead," he wrote in his candidate statement. "We need to build schools when our children need them, not afterward."

Last year Del Mar bused about 200 children from Carmel Valley to Del Mar. With the opening of Ashley Falls School in September, only about 30 students are being bused, said Superintendent Tom Bishop.

Lantry is a lobbyist who has negotiated with developers and cities. He said he's willing and qualified to negotiate on the district's behalf with the city of San Diego over the joint-use park space at school sites. Because part of the Del Mar Union School District is within San Diego city limits, the two jurisdictions have to strike land-use deals for new school openings.

Lantry proposes more music and arts programs for district schools, which he said could be paid for partially through cuts in transportation under a neighborhood school plan.

Appointed incumbents Waite and Disraeli have served on a board that's opened a new school and planned another, hired a new superintendent and presided over state-funded reduction of class sizes.

Waite explained that Del Mar has planned well for growth but that the convergence of a sudden economic boom that's fueled rapid construction in Carmel Valley and class-size reduction has created a sudden space crunch. Not only that, she said, but the crunch has been concentrated east of I-5.

She answered criticisms of busing with a hypothetical question: "Where do you cut the quality for not busing the kids over to this (west) side of the freeway?" Busing distributes students evenly throughout the schools and prevents overcrowding that could detract from learning, she said.

State mandates on planning, design and construction limit how soon the district can build new schools, she said.

She pledges continued quality teaching, new school construction and smart money management in the next four years.

Disraeli said the district deserves credit for planning the new Ashley Falls School years before the economic boom. She said in answer to critics of the pace at which Del Mar is proceeding that if the economy had suddenly suffered, Ashley Falls could be opening with only 300 students instead of its 550 capacity.

She said board members, teachers, administrators and parents will convene a three-day retreat in October to draw up the district's first five-year plan. Also, the board has hired the architect for the district's fifth school with a goal of opening it in two years.

Disraeli said her goal for the next four years is to "have this tremendous growth without compromising our education." She also hopes that eventually all children in the district will be able to attend their neighborhood school.

Myers has volunteered as a classroom aide, PTA president and school site council member. She said she offers a familiarity with district schools and administrators but does not intend to introduce new policies.

"If you have something good, why change it?" she said.

She said she thought the current board had prepared well for the growth spurt, and that in any case there's not much the district can do about the rate of new construction. She also praised the board members for their professionalism and for not leaking to the public information about sensitive issues.

Myers, Waite and Disraeli are running as a slate.

"Under the leadership of Jeanne Waite, Mindy Disraeli and the school board members, the Del Mar district continues to earn its reputation as one of the finest in California. I share their commitment," Myers said in released statement.

Erion responded to the slate announcement by saying, "While I admire Myers for her volunteer work, I feel she lacks the willingness to openly face critical issues in the district." Erion brought up the September 1997 meeting at which she criticized the district and produced a tape of the discussion in which Myers said, "If people don't like it they should go somewhere else."

Smiley, a teacher at Earl Warren Junior High School in Solana Beach, also praised the board's performance and students' test scores as an indicator that they are mastering reading, writing and math. But he would like to expand the schools' offerings.

"I would like to add an element of culture to the schools, music appreciation and drama," Smiley said.

He said he'd also like to implement a more explicit policy to handle cases of harassment of students, either by teachers or by other students, to help ensure school safety. He advocates more teaching of tolerance and diversity utilizing curriculum such as that devised by the Anti-Defamation League, an organization that honored him with a teacher-appreciation award this year.

"Living in a predominantly white community (last year the school population was 87.6 percent white), that can be an issue -- appreciating others," Smiley said.

Finally, Smiley said his experience as a junior high school teacher gives him insight into what students need to do in elementary school to prepare for later grades.

Credit: STAFF WRITER

Saturday, March 28, 1998

Del Mar names schools leader | Jamul-Dulzura's Bishop is chosen

Chris Moran
The San Diego Union - Tribune
Mar 28, 1998. pg. B.1.5

DEL MAR -- Thomas F. Bishop, superintendent of an East County school district that has won numerous awards for its high-quality schools, has been named superintendent of the Del Mar Union School District.

"This man has tremendous energy and passion for kids and education," said Del Mar school board President Jeanne Waite.

The board chose Bishop, superintendent of the Jamul-Dulzura Union School District since 1986, from among 39 applicants. Waite said Bishop's work in building a new middle school, modernizing elementary schools, securing a technology grant for Internet connections and presiding over the passage of a $9 million school bond in 1995 impressed the Del Mar board.

Bishop, 48, currently runs a three-school district with 1,200 kindergarten-through-eighth-grade students.

"I like small school districts because there's a genuine sense of community," Bishop said. "Working in a small school district allows a superintendent to know all the employees, many parents and some of the community."

He will begin working part time in Del Mar on May 4, dividing his time between Del Mar and Jamul-Dulzura until June 29, when he begins working full time for Del Mar.

"To keep the quality of education as our district grows will be a challenge," Waite said. The Del Mar district has some 1,870 students in three kindergarten-through-sixth-grade schools. Explosive growth in Carmel Valley is expected to increase enrollment by 10 percent in the fall, when the district opens its fourth school.

A release issued by Del Mar and Bishop notes that Jamul-Dulzura schools have won National Blue Ribbon Excellence awards in 1989 and 1996, state Distinguished School awards in 1988, 1990, 1992, 1994 and 1997, and a California School Boards Association Golden Bell Award in 1997.

The board plans to ratify a contract with Bishop at its Tuesday meeting. Waite would not specify what Bishop's salary will be before the board ratifies his contract, but said it would be similar to the $106,000 salary former Superintendent Robert Harriman was paid.

Harriman led the district for 13 years, but was put on administrative leave in October for reasons that neither he nor the board have fully disclosed. He resigned in December under an agreement that will pay him as much as $166,420.

Del Mar officials performed their search confidentially and never publicly named any candidates for the job until their announcement that Bishop was their choice.

Credit: STAFF WRITER

Saturday, March 14, 1998

School board to quiz 4 mystery candidates

Chris Moran
The San Diego Union - Tribune
Mar 14, 1998. pg. B.1

DEL MAR -- Four anonymous school administrators will come to town next week to make their pitches to run Del Mar's elementary schools.

The five school board members who will interview the mystery visitors won't identify them -- not their names, gender, ethnicity or state of residence. In fact, four won't talk about the search at all, deferring to board president Jeanne Waite for comment.

By early April, Waite said, the board expects to announce its choice.

"With all of the tremendous growth in our district, we look forward to identifying a superintendent that will move us into the next century," Waite said.

The candidates' identities are being shielded for fear that public knowledge of their candidacy could hurt their relationship with their present employers, Waite said.

Waite commended the performance of Interim Superintendent Herb Farrar, but said that his role is limited largely to caretaker and information gatherer until a permanent replacement arrives. Authority to establish a vision through which the kindergarten- through-sixth-grade district can tackle its challenges -- namely growth -- resides in a permanent leader, she said.

The growth is stunning. The current enrollment of 1,872 is distributed among three schools. A fourth is under construction in Carmel Valley. The district's projected enrollment when the school opens in September is 2,067, a 10 percent student population increase in one year.

Waite said the district may build two more schools within the next three years.

The school board placed former Superintendent Robert Harriman on administrative leave on Oct. 18 for reasons that neither board members nor Harriman have fully disclosed.

Credit: STAFF WRITER

Thursday, December 11, 1997

Del Mar names schools leader | Superintendent will serve on interim basis

Chris Moran
The San Diego Union - Tribune
Dec 11, 1997. pg. B.1

DEL MAR -- Herb Farrar will serve as superintendent of Del Mar elementary schools until trustees hire a permanent successor to Robert Harriman, board members decided last night.

Farrar, 60, retired in July after 18 years as superintendent of Imperial County schools, a position to which he was elected five times.

He takes over from the three principals and other school administrators who assumed Harriman's duties after he was placed on administrative paid leave Oct. 18.

Farrar said he hopes his stewardship of the district, expected to last through April, "will be a time of healing," following Harriman's departure.

Harriman led the Del Mar Union School District for 13 years before school trustees placed him on leave for reasons that neither he nor trustees have fully disclosed.

Harriman had demanded an explanation for the decision, but then resigned on Dec. 4 under an agreement that will pay him as much as $166,420.

Harriman has said the leave dealt with statements he made in anger during a September school board meeting.

At the meeting, critics contended that school administrators were not doing enough to ease overcrowding in fourth- and fifth-grade classrooms.

"We have been called incompetent and many other different things that we highly resent, and we aren't going to put up with it," Harriman said.

"This may be the first time a school district sues a parent, or parents, as you will, for actual defamation of character and libel."

Farrar said he will not be a candidate for the permanent position. He starts Monday as the top administrator for a district of three schools with an enrollment of 1,852 kindergarten through sixth-grade students.

The district's fourth school is scheduled to open next year.

Farrar moved to San Diego last month after a 38-year career in Imperial County schools. He taught elementary school and served as an assistant principal, principal and assistant superintendent before his election as superintendent.

He is the 1997 Imperial County Educator of the Year.

In other business, board members re-elected Jeanne Waite as president of the board.

Credit: STAFF WRITER

Friday, December 5, 1997

Del Mar schools chief resigns | Harriman to be paid for 18 more months

Anna Cearley
The San Diego Union - Tribune
Dec 5, 1997. pg. B.1

DEL MAR -- Nearly two months after being put on administrative leave as superintendent of the Del Mar Union School District, Robert Harriman decided his own fate yesterday by submitting a letter of resignation.

Under an agreement worked out by lawyers for both sides, and unanimously approved by the school board last night, Harriman is entitled to receive payments over the next 18 months totaling as much as $166,420, as long as he is unemployed.

He will also get continued health and welfare benefits for up to 18 months, or until he gets his next job. His resignation is effective Dec. 31, and the benefits start in January.

Harriman was put on administrative paid leave Oct. 18 for reasons that neither he nor school trustees would disclose fully. However, Harriman said it had something to do with statements he made in anger at a September school board meeting.

Last night, the superintendent had been scheduled to defend himself against a list of school board concerns presented to him last month. Trustees were then expected to vote on his fate, and possibly reassign him as a teacher in the district.

But Harriman did not attend the special meeting at Del Mar Heights School and trustees announced his resignation to about 30 members of the public there.

In the agreement approved last night, both parties say Harriman always received good job evaluations and that he "successfully served the district as its superintendent for 13 years, and that the employee was a dedicated, hard-working and competent superintendent."

Trustees declined further comment.

Harriman did not return phone calls.

During last night's scheduled meeting, trustees had been expected to vote on three key issues: whether Harriman was in breach of his contract, whether trustees should release him as superintendent, and whether he should be reassigned to a teaching position.

Some members of the public said they attended expecting to get insight as to exactly why the superintendent had been put on administrative leave.

Trustees ordered Harriman, 59, on administrative paid leave after holding a closed-door meeting on his job performance.

The action came following the trustees' earlier renewal of Harriman's four-year contract, effective in July, said Julie Dubick, an attorney for Harriman. She added that there was no hint of problems in previous job reviews.

In late November, after additional closed-door meetings, Harriman received a packet of materials from trustees detailing the reasons he was placed on leave.

Although he did not reveal details, Harriman said then that he would ask for a public hearing so he could provide a counter- argument. He said issues dealt with personality, management and personnel concerns.

He acknowledged, however, that one concern stemmed from remarks he made in a September board meeting in which critics contended that the Del Mar Union School District wasn't doing enough to ease overcrowding in the fourth and fifth grades.

"We have been called incompetent and many other different things that we highly resent and we aren't going to put up with it," Harriman said during the meeting. "This may be the first time a school district sues a parent,or parents, as you will, for actual defamation of character and libel."

No lawsuit was ever filed, according to school officials. But Harriman's statements prompted some parents to express their concerns with trustees, questioning just how free they are to speak out.

During Harriman's absence, three principals and other administrators assumed his duties in the 1,860-student district.

School officials said they expect to hire an interim superintendent immediately as they start a search for a long-term successor to Harriman.

Mary Farrell, one of the people present at last night's meeting, said she supported the board's actions over the past months.

"I'd like to commend the board for their discretion and dignity," she said. "I think that it's important to look forward and continue educating our children in the best way possible."

Credit: STAFF WRITER