Thursday, May 8, 2008

Del Mar resident Doug Perkins elected to temporary seat on Del Mar School Board; Foundation decides to soldier on

By Ian S. Port
Assistant Editor

Perkins holds a master’s degree in education from the University of Maryland and has served on numerous state education boards, as well as on the executive board of the San Diego County Taxpayer’s Association.

“I’m pretty excited — and humbled,” Perkins said after the meeting. “I felt bad for the board having so many good candidates to vet through. It was tough competition.”

Nominating Perkins for the temporary vacancy, trustee Katherine White said that among a strong field, he had exceptional experience shouldering fiduciary responsibilities.

“I don’t think any of our other candidates have that wealth of experience,” White said, pointing to Perkins’ years on various boards at the city and state level.

Perkins, a Del Mar resident for over 20 years, no longer has children in the Del Mar schools, but remains active in the community and — as with many of the other candidates — attended nearly all of the Del Mar board’s recent meetings. In responding to a question about school funding — a major issue with budget cuts looming this year — Perkins said it was key for school districts to form coalitions and pressure lawmakers in Sacramento to be lean on cuts, as well as to seek alternative sources of funding.

“We’re facing the worst budget in California since I’ve been here,” he said.

Perkins will serve during a crucial time in the district, when trustees will face the daunting tasks of hiring a new superintendent, wrestling with state budget cuts and other financial issues, and healing a school community that has again grown perilously divided.

He will fill the vacancy left by longtime trustee Linda Crawford, whose seat term expires in November. Perkins will have to run again at that point if he wishes to remain on the school board.

Crawford resigned in March over philosophical differences with the three-member board majority shortly after it voted to buy out former Superintendent Tom Bishop. Crawford and another longtime trustee, Janet Lamborghini, who remains on the board, supported Bishop and voted against the decision to oust him.

Bishop’s voluntary resignation brought to a head many prickly issues in the district, and the acrimony and divisiveness it wrought among staff and parents is now considered a major obstacle. Several prospective board members, including Perkins, indicated concerns about those divisions.

But the group will have to conduct any healing while also handling some hard decisions.

Looming large among them is the issue of enrichment program funding, which has dogged the district for nearly two years. The district is contractually obligated to provide its teachers with several hours per week of preparation time during the school day — hours that students now spend in enrichment classes with other certificated teachers.

The enrichment program, which provides art, music, science and technology education to students and allows schools to set their own curriculum and staffing levels, is adored by many district parents, who help fund the program through voluntary donations to the Del Mar Schools Education Foundation.

Without those donations from the DMSEF, the district essentially cannot afford its enrichment teachers — and its teachers’ prep-time hours. But it cannot fire them either, because the employees are fully certificated union members entitled to the same benefits as regular-curriculum teachers. And its contract with teachers guarantees certain levels of prep time.

The process essentially allows schools to fundraise for additional staff, which the district is then obligated to pay — even in years when donations do not support them.

Adding to the difficult situation is a heated political climate that has parents withholding their normal donations to the Foundation in protest of the decision to oust Bishop, according to DMSEF President Bob Gans.

Gans said in a recently letter to the school board that the Bishop controversy and a lack of clear direction from the district threatened the Foundation’s viability, and suggested that the organization consider suspending its operations until the situation becomes clearer.

The DMSEF Board of Directors chose not to do that at its May 6 meeting, with about half of its members saying that it’s too early to give up on the mission of the organization. About another half argued that without more direction and a business model that the community can support, the DMSEF can’t continue fundraising. The group decided to leave the decision to its next board of directors, which will be seated in June.

“If you don’t know what you’re fundraising for, you can’t send fundraising letters,” said board member and Sage Canyon parent Jeb Spencer. “This is the toughest money I’ve ever raised and I’ve raised a lot of money in Washington, D.C.”

At the meeting, Del Mar Trustee and ex-officio Foundation board member Janet Lamborghini acknowledged the difficulties facing both organizations, but said she wholly supported them.

“I’m optimistic for you all,” she told the DMSEF board. “I hope that you will go on.”

Enrichment and staffing levels are only one of many challenges facing the Del Mar School board. Its main task for the summer is finding a replacement for controversial superintendent.

The seven candidates who sought a temporary seat on the district board came with varying levels of familiarity with Del Mar schools, according to their application forms, but all said they wished to serve the mission of the district and help its students. One or more of them may chose to run again for the vacant seat in November.

Mary Slattery Johnson, also a Del Mar resident, has graduate training in education from Stanford University, where she studied the importance of video and multimedia in building literacy. She indicated strong support for the mission of the district’s enrichment program and cited the importance of influencing lawmakers to ensure adequate funding.

Kris Kissner sat on the Del Mar school board and served as its president, and also worked as a staff member for the Foundation. She promised not to run for the permanent seat in November.

Bob Gans is currently the president of the DMSEF and has essentially led the organization as a volunteer this year, in addition to serving in various other volunteer posts throughout the district. A former litigator, Gans cited his ability to make reasonable appeals and disagree respectfully — as well as his considerable knowledge of district matters — as key benefits he would bring to a board post.

Comischell Bradley-Rodriguez is a businesswoman with experience in international trade who has volunteered widely in the district since moving to Carmel Valley eight years ago. She served as PTA president at Sage Canyon for three years, helped run a letter-writing to convince state officials to let Del Mar keep its Basic Aid funding status, and has a knowledge of both music and Spanish.

Stephen Cochrane is a professor of education at Azusa Pacific University in the Special Education Department. Having lived five years in Carmel Valley, Cochrane said he wants to ensure the best possible future for the district his nine-month-old son will eventually attend. Cochrane also ran for a seat on the San Dieguito Union High School District Board in 2006.

Korey Sarokin is an attorney who moved to Carmel Valley about nine months ago. With experience volunteering at her children’s school in New Jersey, and working with underserved children at a community food bank, Sarokin hopes to help unify the community and bolster public education in the district.

Wednesday, May 7, 2008

The Board Candidates At A Glance

Contact Information

NameYrsAdressPhone (h)Phone (w)
Dr. Stephen Cochrane 5 5430 Foxhound Way
San Diego, CA 92130
858.793.9562 858.414.0634
Bob Gans 8 735 Hoska Drive
Del Mar, CA 92014
858.720.0683 858.342.4656
Mary Slattery Johnson 4.5 12881 Via Grimaldi
Del Mar, CA 92014
858.509.2625 858.699.8826
Kris Kissner 25 12624 Carmel Country Rd.#84
San Diego, CA 92130
858.401.0827 760.942.6802
Doug Perkins 20+ 13232 Carousel Lane
Del Mar, CA 92014
858.481.1882 858.752.6145
Comischell Bradley-Rodriguez 8 5427 Foxhound Way
San Diego, CA 92120
858.792.6768 858.205.3113
Korey Kerscher Sarokin 9 mo. 13023 Sandown Way
San Diego, CA 92130
858.350.9373 619.260.4255

Questions

  1. Provide a description of your educational work and/or public service background.
    CandidateAnswer
    Dr. Stephen Cochrane I taught Special Education at the elementary, high school, and community college levels. Currently I am serving as an Education professor at Azusa Pacific University (APU) in the Special Education Department. Additionally, I am the Special Education Coordinator and Technology Director in the Special Education Department at APU. I also served on the Board of Directors for Educational Advocacy for Children, a non-profit institution that serves children in San Diego County. Moreover, I am an active member of the San Diego Special Education Alliance, which is comprised of the Special Education department heads from universities in San Diego County. I served on the Site Governance Team, Site Improvement Team, and was the representative to the San Diego Education Association for Mira Mesa High School. Furthermore, I am on a short list of applicants being considered by the Speaker of the California State Assembly for an appointment to the California Advisory Commission on Special Education. I conducted academic research and presented at Educational conferences on education issues. In conclusion, I ran for the San Dieguito School Board in the 2006 election.
    Bob Gans DEL MAR SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION, May 2006 - Present (Term Expires June 2008)
    President, May 2007-Present
    Vice-President, October 2006 - April 2007
    Board Member, May 2006 - October 2006

    DMUSD ENRICHMENT FUNDING TASK FORCE MEMBER, March 2008 - Present
    DMUSD BUDGET COMMITTEE MEMBER, Mareh 2008 - Present
    DMUSD STRATEGIC PLANNING TEAM MEMBER, October 2007
    DEL MAR HILLS ACADEMY STRATEGIC PLANNING TEAM MEMBER, May 2007
    NATION CHIEF, MAGDALENA-ECKE YMCA Y-PRINCESS PROGRAM, May 2005 -May 2006
    NATION MEDICINE MAN, MAGDALENA-ECKE YMCA Y-GUIDES PROGRAM. May 2003 - May 2004
    DEL MAR HILLS ACADEMY DADS CLUB MEMBER, September 2002 - Present
    Mary Slattery Johnson I have dedicated my professional life to the improvement of public education from within and outside the education system. My work within public schools began as a teacher of language, literature, and social studies in an inner city middle school and my work as a Carnegie Teaching Fellow in the MediaWorks technology program. I continued my work as a Supervisor with the Stanford Teacher Education Program where I supervised high school student teachers in Social Studies through the state credential process.

    My work from outside the educational system continued as a graduate student at Stanford University where I worked as a research assistant for the Professional Development Center assisting the Director in the conceptualization and implementation of teacher workshops focusing on issues of assessment, service learning, and math and science teaching for at-risk students. In addition, I served as an assistant to the Director of the Stanford Alliance for School-Based change and worked with two Alliance elementary schools to document the process ofchange through video for evaluation purposes. My graduate works in Curriculum and Teacher Education at Stanford concentrates on how video and multimedia are changing traditional concepts of literacy. The conceptual foundation ofmy work focuses on theories of multiple intelligences and how we can reach more students through the integration of video and multimedia composition with writing.
    Kris Kissner
    • Former DMUSD Board Member/ Board President
    • Former Del Mar Hills PTA President
    • Del Mar Hills Academy Academy Task Force Member
    • Teaching credential in Business and Industrial Management.
    • Former part time instructor, Mira Costa College.
    • Former trustee/ president, Mira Costa College Foundation
    • Former Sixth Grade Camp Teacher
    Doug Perkins With nearly thirty years in San Diego, I have been involved in a number of leadership positions in the public and non-profit sectors throughout San Diego and California. I have chaired, for approximately 4 years, the City of San Diego Optimization Committee, served on its Select Committee of Governmental Reform and its Electioneering Task Force.

    From 1994 to 1999, I served on the Executive Committees of two State of California Education Boards to which I was appointed, the State Council on Vocational Education and the State Job Training Coordinating Council. I currently serve on several non-profit boards including an affordable housing non-profit as well as one focused on persons with disabilities.

    I have a Masters Degree in Education from the University of Maryland and a B.A. from Bucknell University.
    Comischell Bradley-Rodriguez
    1988: Asbury College, Lexington, KY- BA in Music
    1990: Anglo Americano Instituto Superior, Mexico City, MX- English As a Second Language Teaching Certificate
    1990-91 Colegio del Bosque, Mexico City, Mexico- 12th Grade ESL Teacher
    1996-99 St. Clement's Episcopal School, EI Paso,TX - Classroom Volunteer
    2000-Present: Republican Party, San Diego, CA - Community Volunteer
    2001: Sage Canyon Elementary, San Diego, CA- PTA Financial Secretary
    2002-04,06-07 PTA State Convention, Sacramento & Los Angeles, CA- Leadershipl Officer Training
    2002-05: Sage Canyon Elementary, San Diego, CA - PTA President
    2002-03 Del Mar Union School District, Del Mar, CA - Kindergarten Action Team Member
    2003: Del Mar Union School District, Del Mar, CA - Led the campaign to save Basic Aid Representing the District
    2003-04: Del Mar Union School District, Del Mar, CA - Equity Task Force
    2002-06 Del Mar Union School District, Del Mar, CA - District Strategic Planning Team
    2000-04 Jewish Community Center of La Jolla, La Jolla, CA - Classroom Volunteer
    2002-06: Sage Canyon Elementary, San Diego, CA - Strategic Planning Team
    2000-Present: Sage Canyon Elementary School, San Diego, CA - Classroom Volunteer
    2005-07 North Coastal Council PTA, San Diego, CA - VP Programs I Executive VP
    2007-08 North Coastal Council PTA, San Diego, CA - President
    2008 Ninth District PTA, San Diego, CA- Legislation Action Committee
    Korey Kerscher Sarokin After graduating from law school, I took a legal job in public service. In 1990, I joined the N.Y. (Manhattan) County District Attorney's Office as an Assistant District Attorney. I spent the next nine years prosecuting all manner of street crimes, and then specialized in sex crimes and appeals. While at the N.Y. County District Attorney's Office, I took part in our office's outreach to young at-risk youth by lecturing at schools. After leaving the District Attorney's Office, I spent two years as the director of the Kids Division at the Community Foodbank of N.Y. The program fed, clothed and provided school supplies to at-risk children.
  2. Why do you wish to serve on the board and what do you wish to accomplish?
    CandidateAnswer
    Dr. Stephen Cochrane I have a long-standing desire to serve as a trustee on one of my local school boards, as evident by my run for the San Dieguito Board race in 2006. My desire to serve on a school board is not motivated by a specific issue, but rather to serve my community in my area of expertise and share my personal strengths to better educate the children in our community. My nine-month-old son will eventually attend school in the Del Mar Union School District, and like other parents in our community, I would like him to receive an optimal education. I hope that my contribution as a school board member, would result in continuing the outstanding education provided by the Del Mar Union School District.
    Bob Gans I wish to be a bridge-builder by representing and acting in the best interests of all ofthe children of our District. I became President of the DMSEF at a time that it was subject to extensive criticism by various stakeholder groups. Our board was able to end much of that controversy by communicating more effectively with the community than we had in the past. This meant seeking out meetings with parents and administrators at every school, listening to their concerns, and explaining the measures that we hoped to implement to make the organization stronger and more effective. It also meant making tough decisions at times, and then embracing dialogue with those who opposed those decisions after they were made, to explain our rationale and fully understand the basis for their opposition. In pursuing this course, I understood that reasonable minds often differ on the best resolution of a given issue. Nevertheless, if the decision is made openly and honestly, and the rationale is communicated effectively, then even those who disagree with the outcome should not doubt the underlying integrity ofthe organization or its efforts to act in the best interests of all stakeholders.

    I believe that I can put these same skills to work: to help the Board address the difficult and potentially divisive issues it is currently facing. From my work: speaking on behalf of the DMSEF throughout the District over the past year, I have gained a unique, district-wide perspective not limited to one or two schools. I have learned that our community is far larger and more diverse than many appreciate, which often results in different views and priorities among the various stakeholders at each of our eight schools. I understand the importance ofconsidering the views of all stakeholders as part of the decision-making process and of attempting to build a consensus. I also understand the importance of making decisions, rather than allowing issues to linger, and then pro-actively communicating the rationale for these decisions by leaving the boardroom and getting out to the schools. I believe this to be the essence of good leadership, which I hope to help the Board to exercise if my application is accepted.
    Mary Slattery Johnson It is an important period of transition in the school district with the departure of the superintendent and the uncertain relationship with the Del Mar Education Foundation. I believe that my experience working with different groups ofpeople who look at educational issues from varied perspectives will help me explain the search process and the need for a foundation for the different school communities. I hope to create stronger ties between the Board and the various elementary schools.

    In addition, my knowledge ofschool programs and my analytical skills could help in the search for alternative sources of funding for the school district.
    Kris Kissner I would like to assist through the transition until the election of a permanent board member. I have been through the process of choosing an administrator for the District and am familiar with the board responsibilities during summer and for the preparation of the new fall term. I do not intend to seek the position permanently because I feel it would be very beneficial to have the new permanent board member be elected from citizens coming to the elections without a quasi-incumbant on the ballot.
    Doug Perkins During this period of transition I hope to help guide the district and its professional staff through the multiple challenges ahead-from hiring a new Superintendent to managing the process of locating a 21'S' century administrative complex.

    I hope to bring a "can-do" atmosphere of accomplishment to the district, a stronger emphasis on public involvement in the decision-making process and respect for the various points of view of parents committed to the students of our district.
    Comischell Bradley-Rodriguez I wish to bring my experience and background to the Board because I feel that I can contribute in a positive way to DMUSD issues. Having served various years in the District and Site Strategic Planning Committees I feel that I have a good historical understanding of the district. My experience as PTA President and Classroom volunteer has helped me see first-hand how Board decisions are relied upon and implemented. In addition, having served on both the District's Kindergarten Action Team and the original Equity Task Force, I can appreciate the complexity of the issues and the careful research that must be done prior to making any major decision. My knowledge of the Spanish language and passion for the arts - specifically Music- will complement current Board objectives to support ESL curriculum and the Spanish Immersion program. Having used the Spanish language to conduct business, I understand the value of our children learning a second language. I will bring fresh eyes,and ears, and hands to the issues and work with you-exchanging ideas and collaborating to facilitate action and move our district forward in a positive direction.
    Korey Kerscher Sarokin I wish to serve on the board because I hope to contribute to the succesful education of my children and the children of this district. I have always been interested in the well-being of children, and I believe assisting the school district to achieve academic excellence is a wonderful way to accomplish this. We are new to California, and I wish to be involved in our new community. As for accomplishments, I hope to assist the board make education for all a top priority while helping board, teachers, and families become a unified commnity.
  3. What skills, abilities, and experience would you bring to the Board to assist in carrying out its responsibilities?
    CandidateAnswer
    Dr. Stephen Cochrane The most important thing a school board does is to establish a vision for the community's schools that reflects a consensus of the board, community and district staff. The school board has a wide variety of additional responsibilities, such as adopting a balanced annual budget and issuing interim financial reports, adopting the school calendar, negotiating contracts with employee unions, approving curriculum materials and closing or constructing schools. My leadership experience and training as a teacher, business owner, Education professor, and university administrator has resulted in my acquiring knowledge and skills in curriculum development, instructional programs, educational technology, financial management, and collaboration and consensus building. I have a proven track record of success in leadership positions in both business and education that demonstrate mastery of vital skills and abiliites to serve as an effective school board member.
    Bob Gans My answer to Question 2 explains how my experience on the DMSEF would assist the Board in carrying out its responsibilities. I am also an attorney who has focused in the areas of accounting fraud and corporate fiduciary duty litigation for the past 18 years. During much of that time, my clients have been large public pension funds seeking to redress corporate wrongs. As such, I have a firm understanding ofthe fiduciary duties of directors and public trustees, as well as the appropriate manner of discharging these fiduciary duties while avoiding conflicts of interest. As an experienced litigator, I also believe that I have developed a good ability to analyze complex issues rationally, and communicate these issues and their resolution in a clear, logical, and coherent manner. I believe that I have applied these skills with great success over the past year, both through my leadership of the DMSEF Board and through my interactions with the various DMUSD administrators, trustees, and school principals and PTA Presidents.
    Mary Slattery Johnson I would bring financial skills honed as a financial analyst at Credit Suisse First Boston on Wall Street, media production skills cultivated in the New York publishing world, teaching and curriculum development skills developed as a middle school teacher, and an ability to work with the many constituencies ofteachers, administrators, policy makers, parents and students that contribute to the district. I have the ability to synthesize complex educational issues into a comprehensive format without oversimplifying the many uncertainties and trade offs that educational decisions must take into account. My strongest abilities are my excellent verbal, written, and video communication skills developed over the years working with diverse school districts and through my rigorous academic training.

    The experiences described in Question # 1 would also prove to be invaluable in assisting the Board.
    Kris Kissner
    • I have been trained through the California School Boards Association
      (New member workshops and annual meetings)
    • I am familiar with most schools, administrators and many teachers and staff.
    • I am acquainted with many families in the District.
    • I am sensitive to the differences in neighborhoods and schools.
    • I am dedicated to consensus building.
    Doug Perkins Having served in a variety of public positions, I offer a fresh perspective on the importance of the public participation process as me Boara aelloerates on its critical decisions ahead.

    As a businessman and a former Executive Committee member of the San Diego County Taxpayers Association, I have a keen eye for finances and am "up to speed" on understanding important aspects of the state and local funding processes in these difficult budgetary times.

    Additionally, I have a broad network of personal contacts with government and civic leaders which may help the District as it moves forward.
    Comischell Bradley-Rodriguez As a committed community volunteer, businesswoman, and mother, I will bring a wealth of skills, abilities and experience to the Board. In the DMUSD I have volunteered as PTA Financial Secretary, Parliamentarian and President, over-seeing budgets and programs. I have served on Site Council and learned about the processes of funding school needs. I have a broad knowledge base of the district to build upon and feel that I could begin working as an effective member of your team right away. Having served on a variety of Non-Profit and For-Profit Boards, I understand the value of listening, collaborating, and working with others to solve problems. I have experience in working with employees and union representatives. I have worked with auditors, the media and the international community. I respect individual opinions and honor democracy. For the past fifteen years I have been involved in the international and national business world in various capacities including: marketing, public relations, imports, wholesale distribution, the .operation and administration of a transportation company, and the sale of corporations and real property. In that time I have learned skills that have proven crucial to success in any project, be it for profit or non-profit. The skills I bring to the Board include the ability to listen, to communicate effectively, to work with a team and collaborate. Finally, the knowledge one brings to the table as a parent cannot be underscored enough when understanding children and their needs is a must. Public education has many nuances in serving the needs of its children, families and staff. I bring a set of skills and abilities and experience that will be an asset to the Del Mar Union School District Board of Trustees.
    Korey Kerscher Sarokin I am an attorney. I have spent approximately fifteen years as a criminal trial attorney, over nine years as an assistant district attorney an over five years as a defense attorney at a private firm. I have learnet to investigate all sides of issues, question people, present persuasive arguments, and make critical decisions impacting people's lives and liberty. Additionally, during my two years at the Community Foodbank of NJ's Kids Division, I spent my time in schools and after school programs working to improve children's lives.
  4. List your involvement in activities that demonstrate your understanding and support for public education, such as membership on committees/organizations, offices held, volunteer work, and community service.
    CandidateAnswer
    Dr. Stephen Cochrane Over the past four years, I have trained over 200 teachers in San Diego, Riverside, and Los Angeles counties. On a daily basis, I observe and mentor beginning teachers in their classrooms. I collaboratively work with San Diego County school districts to prepare beginning teachers for the challenges in the classroom. In certain school districts, I'm invited to participate on hiring committees. I served as a member of the board of directors for Educational Advocacy for Children (EAC). EAC's mission is to support learning for children with special needs. I conducted academic research in various areas in Education. Furthermore, I have presented academic research in Education at international, national, and local education conferences. I am a member of Academic Education Research Association, National Association for Christians in Special Education, and the San Diego Coalition on Special Education.
    Bob Gans I believe that my work on behalf of the DMSEF, as well as my participation in the 2-day strategic planning session held in October and the enrichment funding task force, has given me a first-hand appreciation of what it means to support public education in the Del Mar Union School District. I have gained an extensive understanding not only ofthe financial realities of providing a first-rate public education to all students, but also an appreciation of the need to address concerns of fairness and equity in a district that is far more diverse than many people realize. I feel that I have gained a unique, district-wide perspective on these issues that could help the Board in its work, having had so much direct contact with parents, teachers, and staff at the various schools throughout the District.
    Mary Slattery Johnson My work as a teacher, teacher education supervisor, and involvement in school reform through the Professional Development Center and Stanford Alliance for School-Based Change demonstrate my deep understanding ofpublic education. And my roles ofclassroom volunteer for four years, room parent, member of the Strategic Planning Committee, and Site Council Representative at Del Mar Heights School demonstrate my support on the local level.
    Kris Kissner
    • Past service on DMUSD School Board
    • DMUSD reepresentative to North County Special Ed Consortium (NCCSE)
    • Former Sixth Grade Camp teacher
    • Parent Volunteer in classroom
    • PTA President
    • Staff member Del Mar Schools Education Foundation
    Doug Perkins As vice-chair of the San Diego County Taxpayers Association, I was part of an effort to begin to establish principles to provide support for school district bonding measures which are critical for modernization of facilities and strengthening student achievement.

    I also served for approximately five years on a local mentoring non-profit, Casa de Amistad, whose chief aim is to provide tutors for limited English speakers to assist them in achieving higher educational attainment.

    For the past several years I have served as a Head Soccer coach, assistant Little League Coach and have been active in a variety of committees and efforts at mv church.
    Comischell Bradley-Rodriguez When our funding from Basic Aid was in crisis a few years ago I stepped up to help by organizing a successful letter writing campaign to our congressmen and Governor. I personally lobbied on behalf of the District by visiting one-on-one with State Senator Dee Dee Alpert, First Lady Sharon Davis, State Assembly Members Mark Wyland and George Plescia, and Congressman Brian Bilbray here in San Diego and in Sacramento. Since those days I have remained active in PTA, attending leadership courses and serving on North Coastal Council PTA as VP of Programs, Executive VP and President. Currently I am supporting PTA's efforts to address the budget crises by participating on a Ninth District PTA committee to organize a rally to Flunk the Budget. Below is a summary of the volunteer work I have done in the last few years:
    2000-Present Del Mar Union School District - PTA Member and Leader
    2005 Del Mar Union School District - Sage Canyon Elementary Principal Hiring Committee
    2006-07 Del Mar Union School District - Sage Canyon Elementary - Site Council
    2004-05 San Dieguito Union High School District - Carmel Valley Middle School - Site Council
    2004-06 San Dieguito Union High School District - Carmel Valley Middle School - PTSA Exec VP, President
    2007-Present San Dieguito Union High School District - Torrey Pines High School Foundation Board Member (Athletic Advisory Committee and Parent Rep to SDUHSD)
    2007-Present San Dieguito Union High School District - TPHS Football Parent Liaison
    Korey Kerscher Sarokin Over the past years, I have been involved in my children's elementary school in Westfield, NJ. I participated in teaching Art Appreciation, volunteered on the Community service Committee, and was the parent advisor for the Student Council. I also feel strongly that my work with the underserved children in NJ through the Community Foodbank was invaluable in helping me understand the critical importance of good public education in a child's (and community's life.
  5. List, in order of importance, the major issues confronting public education and, specifically, the Del Mar Union School District.
    CandidateAnswer
    Dr. Stephen Cochrane The following bullets represent pressing issues in public education and in the Del Mar Union School District.
    • Teacher training
    • Early intervention for struggling readers using research-based instructional programs
    • Acquiring and managing resources
    • Effective curriculum development implementing state standards
    • Integrating technology into the curriculum
    • Collaboration with universities and local businesses to yield improved educational results for children.
    Bob Gans
    • Installing a permanent superintendent for the District.
    • Providing a stable, secure environment, with appropriate boundaries, where education professionals can perform their jobs effectively without fear of unfair retribution or micro-management.
    • Finding a long-term solution for the funding issues that have caused so much confusion and concern throughout the District
    • Effectively balancing the twin values of diversity and equity amongst our schools.
    • Rebuilding a sense of community throughout our District.
    Mary Slattery Johnson
    1. The ability ofthe Del Mar Union School District to continue educating the whole child through its enrichment programs.
    2. The funding issue-the ability ofthe school district to influence lawmakers on the current and future budget choices for education and to explore alternative funding sources like bond issues, foundation grants, and innovative funding ideas.
    3. The search for a new superintendent-keeping close communication flowing with the principals, staff and families of the different elementary schools.
    4. Creating a culture where each "neighborhood school" can flourish with its own identity, strengths and unique culture. Rather than centralizing and standardizing policies, the Del Mar School Board can listen and help schools identify what makes each "special".
    Kris Kissner
    • Funding (Public and Private)
    • Keeping curriculum up-to-date in an information based society
    • Fluctuations in demographics
    • Government compliance issues
    • Boundary issues
    Doug Perkins Most important to our District is the selection of a Superintendent with the leadership qualities to build upon our successes and move us forward in the next decade and its challenges of tight budgets, increasing student achievement... etc.

    Additionally, while DMUSD has been incredibly fortunate to have parents who contribute to the school programs, the Foundation and the District need to reestablish a healthy and proper relationship. This must be a top priority if we are to maintain our high quality educational experience for our children.

    Also, we need to address our antiquated headquarters situation and provide management with the tools needed to effectively manage an expanding organization with 500 employees.
    Comischell Bradley-Rodriguez
    1. Hiring a new Superintendent: The Board must complete the search procedure for hiring a new superintendent and establish an amicable working relationship. The whole school community must be involved in the process.
    2. The State Budget Crises: Even though we are a Basic Aid district we are affected by categorical funding and unfunded mandates. Declining enrollment and declining tax revenues will have a significant effect on our finances in the future. Planning ahead and staying on top of our State budget and the yearly crises will help us as a district to keep on as even a keel as possible in the coming years.
    3. Viability of the Foundation: This is a hot topic now and I feel that parents are just beginning to understand the need for the supplemental income our Foundation provides.
    4. Continuing Respectful Relations with the Teachers' Association: For our children to receive the very best public education it is vital that our staff and teachers feel respected and appreciated for their professional contribution to the education of our kids. I believe in the golden rule and respect our teachers and staff as so many go above and beyond their calls of duty. Providing a positive working environment will foster a finer quality of education for our children.
    5. The Equity Issue: This is an old issue that deserves addressing with an Action Team.
    6. Enrichment Program Stability: This will come when our Equity Issue and Foundation Issues are r~solved. Our children deserve broad and consistent education.
    Korey Kerscher Sarokin
    1. Funding
    2. Wise appropriation of funding
    3. Community support
    4. Maximization of classroom hours
    5. Daily time alotted for the arts, P.E., and technology
  6. Explain the mission of the Del Mar Union School District:
    CandidateAnswer
    Dr. Stephen Cochrane The Del Mar Union School District is committed towards providing rigorous academics in a nuturing environment. The ultmate objective is to foster in children an unquenchable desire for intellectual growth, develop well-rounded young people, and prepare students for the challenges of the future.
    Bob Gans The mission of the DMUSD should be to provide the best education possible and maximize the potential of every child at our school Success in achieving this mission cannot be measured exclusively by STAR testing results, API scores, or academic grades. Equally important is fostering the social development of our children, so that they are prepared to meet the challenges they will face in adolescence and adulthood. Primary responsibility for achieving this mission lies with the professionals - the teachers, principals, and administrators who have devoted years oftraining and experience to educating our children. The role ofschool board members in achieving this mission should be focused upon:
    1. continually evaluating our progress toward achieving the mission;
    2. determining the resources necessary to allow the professionals to achieve this mission, and the ways and means of obtaining those resources;
    3. allocating existing resources in the best manner possible consistent with the mission;
    4. insulating the education professionals from the "politics of the moment";
    5. making important decisions on an informed basis quickly and transparently; and
    6. setting an example for our children and the entire community.
    Mary Slattery Johnson The mission ofthe Del Mar Union School District is to educate the "whole child" meaning that a strong academic curriculum is BALANCED by a strong enrichment program. The statement that the district wants to "nurture creativity, confidence, persistence and problem solving to enable life long learners with an appreciation for music and culture" inspires this mission to create well educated students. I support this mission wholeheartedly and will support this program that emphasized educating students over making them the sum oftheir test scores. To me, that is what academic excellence embodies.
    Kris Kissner In my own words:

    To inspire and nurture the growth of the students ofDMUSD into well-rounded citizens and individuals ready to step into the future by providing the best programs coupled with excellent teachers and staff and supported by the community
    Doug Perkins The Del Mar Unified School District is first and foremost about providing the highest quality educational experience for our community's children, preparing them to excel in the higher grades and compete in the global economy. According to our Mission Statement, we must involve our community and staff in our "continually evolving" development of programs that achieve academic excellence. This is a vision I share.
    Comischell Bradley-Rodriguez The mission of the DMUSD encompasses all the elements necessary for successful public education. First and foremost, we mustprovide exemplary education for our children. This is possible through a positive work environment, mutual respect and input from the whole school community. Our education aljgns with State Standards, but the DMUSD expects more of its teachers, staff and students by holding everyone to a higher standard. Our mission calls for respect of the individual and support for each person's uniqueness. Our academic excellence aims to go above and beyond the basics. We must be fiscally responsible and recognize that public education in the DMUSD must evolve to meet the challenges of the future. The district strategic plan has outlined goals for continuous improvement. I support those goals.
    Korey Kerscher Sarokin The DMUSD's mission must be a single-minded devotion to the children's education. The District must provide the type of education and learning environment that inspires our children to learn, not memorize. DMUSD (and all the school districts) mission is to provide the foundation for a bright future for the children and our community.

Saturday, April 26, 2008

Letter From Del Mar Schools Foundation: Are We Necessary?

Source: Carmel Valley News, April 24, 2008

By Ian S. Port
Assistant Editor

The president of the Del Mar Schools Education Foundation questioned the viability and necessity of the fundraising organization in an April 2 letter to the Del Mar Union School District, saying that the district had not done enough help to ensure parent support of the organization in the wake of its controversial decision to buy out Superintendent Tom Bishop’s contract.

The letter from DMSEF President Bob Gans further underscored the tensions in a tumultuous period for the district, which in just over a month has seen the departure of Bishop and longtime school board member Linda Crawford, as well as noisy debate between factions torn over those and other decisions.

Gans said the DMSEF, which raises funds from parents to support the district’s enrichment curriculum, has suffered from a drop off of parent contributions in the wake of Bishop’s departure as parents who disagreed with the decision withhold funds in protest. He now sees that evaporation of support, along with the district’s reaction to an earlier request for help, as potential signs that the Foundation isn’t viable in its current form.

“[District] comments raise doubt regarding the necessity and desirability of maintaining a district-wide fundraising organization such as the Foundation,” Gans wrote. “Therefore the principal agenda item at our May 6, 2008 Board meeting will be to determine the feasibility of accomplishing our mission under the current environment, and whether it would be preferable to suspend our operations at the present time.”

This latest statement follows district trustees’ decision not to grant an earlier request from the Foundation that the school district apply its annual contribution of parent funds to the 2008-09 school year rather than the current year. (Under the current system, some funds go to toward the current year and some toward the next year.)

Gans said that change in policy would ease the ire of donors who disagreed with the decision to seek Bishop’s resignation by assuring them of the district’s financial viability in the current year. It would also create a fundraising system he said was simpler and which many have long desired.

But at its March 26 meeting, the DMUSD Board of Trustees reasoned that it wasn’t their place to tell the Foundation — a legally separate entity — how to allocate its donations. Calling the move to funding the future year “a smart decision,” trustee Katherine White said the Foundation could do it, but that the board should not require it.

“I have a problem as a board voting on constraints that we are giving to another organization,” White said.

Other board members and staff also said such a move would make them uncomfortable for legal reasons.

“To say that the only way that we could accept this would be with these conditions — I would just caution the board against doing that,” Interim Superintendent Janet Bernard said, adding, “I don’t think that what the Foundation is asking is unreasonable.”

The district was made more uncomfortable by the requirement included in the Foundation’s March 6 proposal that it fund enrichment staff at the same level for 2008-09 as it did in the current year. While the formula has not changed, trustees said, the number of students might, thus necessitating a change in the level of enrichment funding.

Gans said the district misunderstood his request, and sees their decision not to act on his proposal as a denial of support for the Foundation’s mission at a crucial time.

“We were never asking the district for permission to donate money for next year,” Gans said. “What we were saying is, we’re donating this money but we suggest you apply it all next year. And what I heard was them say well, that’s a great idea but we don’t really want to take responsibility for doing that.”

As a result, Gans said, the DMSEF continues to suffer from a falloff in contributions from angry parents. He also believes the district hurt the DMSEF’s goal of getting all schools to meet their base fundraising levels by telling one parent March 26 that a school could fund additional enrichment teachers even if it didn’t meet its base target. (Schools are allowed to fund two additional enrichment positions in addition to those allocated by the standard curriculum. The base goal includes funding only for standard enrichment staffing.)

“The last thing that you wanted to happen was for a school to be able to opt out of the baseline and then come in with extra money at the end and, unfortunately, I’m afraid that that’s the direction we’re headed in right now,” Gans said. “If there’s such a strong preference in this community for exclusively site-specific funding, then the question is why do you need a district-wide foundation?”

But the district has never answered the question of what happens if a school site fails to meet its Foundation fundraising goals and thus could not financially support either the enrichment staff normally allocated to it or any additional staff it may have purchased in past years. The deadline to issue pink slips to staff for next year — March 15 — has long passed, meaning the district is set with the current level of permanent teachers for next year, no matter what funds come in.

School Board President Annette Easton insisted that the district could not tell the foundation how to designate its donations to the district.

“Bob [Gans] wants us to tell him what we’re going to do, or how to have him give us the money,” Easton said. “But we can’t do that so that puts him in a quandary about how to give it to us.”

Part of the problem seems to be that the current situation is completely new to both entities. After legal worries led to a massive shakedown last year of the relationship between the district and the foundation, new steps were taken to ensure their separation. Thus, donations this year — the first new of the new relationship — may be designated differently than those in the past.

Dena Whittington, assistant superintendent of business services for the district, said that in the past Foundation checks have always included specific instructions on how the money is used — including for which school year.

“They’ve always told us what year in the past,” Whittington said. “What year, and what school … and for what part of their program.”

Gans said that would not be the case with this year’s check, which the Foundation plans to hand over April 15. The money will only be allocated for enrichment at specific sites, as laid out by donors.

“The foundation could certainly do that [designate the funds for a particular school year], however the Foundation never told anyone this year that we were restricting our contributions to a particular year,” Gans said. “We certainly would not take it on ourselves to allocate money for [the district].”

The school board put some of the district’s other divisive concerns to rest at its March 26 meeting, where trustee Katherine White apologized for statements she made in public that led some parents and staff to call for her resignation. The board decided then that White’s comments did not constitute a leak of confidential information and did not warrant a censure. But that didn’t keep White from facing more public criticism.

“I would like to ask you Katherine please, in the future, to think before you speak,” trustee Janet Lamborghini said. “I’m given to hyperbole in a lot of other methods of communication, but I think as board members we have to be very careful what we say. I’m just asking you personally to please do a little bit more editing as you speak.”

The March 26 meeting saw the district decide to seek a greater number of search firms before deciding on one to find a permanent replacement for Tom Bishop.

The school board also ratified a contract making Janet Bernard the interim superintendent, and agreed to appoint a temporary member to take Linda Crawford’s seat until a permanent trustee is elected in November.

The district has released an application packet for those who wish to be considered for the temporary post. The application is available on the district’s Web site [www.dmusd.org] and must be returned by 3 p.m. April 25. Candidates will be interviewed by the school board at an upcoming special meeting.

The district is legally required to fill the seat by May 12.

Marsha Sutton - Shutting down the Del Mar Schools Foundation

By Marsha Sutton

Source: April 24, 2008 Carmel Valley News

Like a moth drawn to a flame, I keep coming back to the Del Mar Union School District and its mounting challenges.

Seeing the glass as half-full rather than half-empty, I find the problems facing the district to be opportunities for much-needed improvement rather than symptoms of an irreversible slide into educational despair, as the doom-and-gloom naysayers are predicting.

Critics of the current school board have suggested that the loss of former DMUSD superintendent Tom Bishop, whose contract was bought out in February, is ruinous for the district. But in fact, the release of Bishop offers a unique chance to modify the way the district previously conducted its business, which has been characterized as secretive, autocratic, divisive, and in some aspects ultimately unworkable.

Built upon shaky foundations, the enrichment program, tied as it is to the district’s labor contract, is perhaps one of the district’s biggest challenges. The principle of the program is phenomenal; the implementation under Bishop’s tenure was not.

It all started about six years ago, with preparation time for teachers.

According to Rodger Smith, DMUSD director of human resources and facilities planning, “Classroom teacher prep time is guaranteed in the collective bargaining contract.”

A juicy perk, that time to prepare for lessons – 120 minutes each week for teachers of grades 1-3 and 180 minutes per week for grades 4-6 teachers – is provided within the school day, not before or after school.

Calling it “a significant benefit,” Smith said he didn’t know of any other district that offers such a prep-time guarantee.

To accommodate this lovely bonus, something needed to be done with students while their classroom teachers were otherwise occupied.

Voila! Enrichment teachers could step into the breach and take the students while classroom teachers engage in prep time.

Snag. According to Smith, all teachers must be certificated. “If enrichment teachers are teaching, they must have a valid California teaching credential authorizing them to teach the subject(s) for which they are providing instruction,” he said in an email.

So rather than hire excellent, available, highly qualified artists, musicians, scientists or technology experts who have subject knowledge in abundance but lack a teaching certificate, the district must find instructors in these subjects who are full-fledged teachers, entitled to all the rights of other teachers on staff, including job security through tenure and pay according to the certificated teachers’ salary schedule.

The more students, the more costly enrichment teachers to cover for the classroom teachers during prep time. This means money to pay the salaries of all those enrichment teachers who don’t come cheap when they all must be certificated.

Smith called the prep-time guarantee “pretty expensive.” Others have called it fiscally irresponsible. With the district’s projected need for 31 enrichment teachers this coming school year, at an estimated $75,000 each, that little prep-time perk is expected to cost the district a whopping $2,325,000 this coming year.

The Solana Beach School District requires that only one of its five enrichment programs – music – have credentialed instructors. The other four – computer lab, science, art, and P.E. – are taught by instructional aides who are classified rather than certificated employees, according to Bill Banning, SBSD’s assistant superintendent of administrative services and human resources.

Banning said the salaries for instructional aides are generally less than those of credentialed teachers, but their tenure rights are similar.

Although Banning said it is “ingrained in the culture” that teachers use the time students are in enrichment classes to prepare for lessons, there is no prep-time guarantee in Solana Beach’s labor contract. This gives Solana Beach greater flexibility, more financial stability in lean times, and fewer staffing headaches.

Curious that Del Mar would enforce such costly, rigorous standards when Solana Beach offers quality enrichment taught by teachers who need not be credentialed.

But Smith indicated there was no way to skirt around the issue, stating, “If other districts are assigning non-certificated staff to ‘tech,’ they may be violating the law as I understand it.”

He elaborated, “It should be noted, however, that the term ‘teach’ is often applied incorrectly when interactions between adults and students at a public school are described. If an individual is independently planning instruction, carrying out instruction, and evaluating student progress relative to that instruction, then they must have a valid California teaching credential that authorizes them to do so.”

“If an individual is conducting these activities and they do not possess the required credential, the certificated administrator who is responsible for directing that individual to do so may experience adverse actions up to and including revocation of their credential by the state of California.”

Smith added that “there are regular situations in public schools, however, where non-certificated individuals are assigned to ‘review and/or reinforce’ previously taught concepts and/or skills with students under the general direction of a certificated teacher; this type of activity is not regarded as ‘teaching’ and therefore does not require that the individual conducting the activity possess a teaching credential.”

Even “monitored” instruction, where a certificated employee is in the room with a non-credentialed instructor during lessons is not considered acceptable by Smith.

“Students have to be under the supervision of credentialed teachers,” Banning agreed, but he did not believe a credentialed teacher actually needed to be present in the room during the lesson. He said having credentialed employees nearby, on the campus and in the vicinity, sufficed.

So is Solana Beach in violation of state law? Doubtful, with experienced leader Leslie Fausset in charge. Or is Del Mar over-the-top in its strict application of California’s Education Code?

Del Mar’s pickle

The way out of Del Mar’s pickle – being forced, through contractual obligations, to fund salaries for teachers the district cannot afford to pay – was to place the burden on the parents.

Enter the Del Mar Schools Education Foundation.

“The Foundation was founded to raise the necessary funds to provide Del Mar Union School District students with enrichment programs such as science, music, art, technology and physical education,” states the DMSEF Web site.

Having parents pay for a contractual requirement made by the district to the teachers is perfect – and outrageous – illustration of what’s gone wrong in Del Mar under the former superintendent and his previous rubber-stamp school board.

Bishop’s threats that schools would lose enrichment teachers if parents didn’t pony up more money fast, turned out to be empty. The district’s grossly inappropriate strong-arm tactics appear to be nothing more than a shake-down to squeeze more bucks out of parents, when the district was on the hook all along.

If parents didn’t raise the money, the district was still required to do something with the kids during teacher prep time. And according to the district, whatever it was had to be with a certificated teacher.

So the arrangement between the school district and the foundation from the beginning was solidly linked to the funding of the enrichment program – which was needed to relieve the district of its contractual obligation to fund salaries it couldn’t afford.

Did no one consider what might happen if parent donations fell off? The whole house of cards was destined to collapse if one piece became unstable.

When Bob Gans took over as president of the foundation last year, a few months after the new DMUSD school board was seated, a spirit of openness and cooperation seemed to replace mistrust and conflict. After allegations surfaced against prior leaders of the foundation of mismanaging funds, undue secrecy, and an all-too-cozy relationship with the school district, Gans’ appointment was welcome relief.

The hard-working foundation board members (and there are few others more hard-working than these dedicated individuals) tackled their volunteer efforts with renewed vitality.

The change won over many critics and infused the community with a sense that the housecleaning would bring greater stability to the district’s educational programs through increased charitable donations.

But success turned out to be elusive, and initial confidence may have been premature.

Like a child on the playground who takes his marbles and goes home if he can’t get his way, Gans recently threatened to suspend the foundation’s operations unless the school board gives him what he wants.

In an April 2 letter to trustees, Gans objected to the district’s reluctance to promise to assign all of this year’s donations to next year’s programs – a move that would have betrayed the promise given to this year’s donors who thought that at least a portion of their donations would be applied to this year’s programs.

Apparently accustomed to operating under the old rules – which allowed Bishop to dictate to the foundation how much money he needed, from which communities, and by when – the foundation now seems at a loss as to how to function independently without explicit direction from the school board.

The school board, under advice from legal counsel last year, rightfully declined to overstep its authority by inserting itself into foundation business. No more telling the foundation how much to raise, how to raise it, how to donate, or when.

On April 15, the foundation presented the school district with a check for $522,920.20 which Gans said represents the gross amount of money raise from this year’s Annual appeal. The foundation gave the money to the school district to be disbursed according to the donors’ wishes, which were as follows:

Ashley Falls
Carmel Del Mar
Del Mar Heights
Del Mar Hills
Ocean Air
Sage Canyon
Sycamore Ridge
Torrey Hills
$62,877.80
$45,187.00
$78,875.00
$63,550.00
$68,005.00
$90,659.26
$52,925.00
$60,841.14

This averages about $65,365 per school.

In March, the Solana Beach Foundation for Learning donated $409,602.40 to the Solana Beach School District. Divided among its six schools, this averages about $68,267 per school.

If Solana Beach can raise more money per school using their friendly, site-driven approach, then why can’t Del Mar? Certainly Solana Beach’s fundraising style generates significantly less animosity and dissension.

Further complicating the issue are Gans’ repeated public comments that donations are down because some parents question why money for enrichment programs is needed when the district had enough to buy out Bishop’s contract. Flawed logic, of course, which Gans does little to dispel.

First, Bishop’s $300,000 buyout will take place over three fiscal years, not all at once. Second, withholding money from children’s educational programming to protest the departure of Bishop punishes no one but the kids. Third, people who haven’t donated by now, so late in the year, are unlikely to donate anyway. Fourth, the only plausible reason to continue to talk about Bishop in this context is to inflame the public.

In his April 2 letter, Gans suggests the foundation may be unable to accomplish its mission “under the current environment. Perhaps its easier to find scapegoats to blame than to admit some fundamental flaw in management style or fundraising ability.

Whether it’s negotiating in public, making demands, or outright blackmail, it stinks. And the school board should call his bluff. Let the foundation shut down; it’s gone sour anyway.

The DMSEF desperately needs brand new leadership, a complete overhaul to harness the energy and enthusiasm of devoted board members and volunteers who truly want to help Del Mar’s kids without the burden of political gotcha games and historical baggage undermining their efforts.

The Del Mar Schools Education Foundation will consider suspending operations at its May 6 meeting. Perhaps this can be viewed as an opportunity to wipe the slate clean and begin anew, like a phoenix rising from the ashes – because at some point, trying to fix a botched mess is harder than trashing the whole thing and rebuilding it from scratch the right way.

This may mean going back to the negotiating table with Del Mar’s teachers to re-open the issue of prep time.

It may mean clarifying what can be done with students during prep time, and developing options that give the district more latitude regarding the certificated teacher issue for enrichment programs.

It may mean a site-based, bottom-up restructuring of a new Del Mar schools foundation, like the Solana Beach model, that upends the previous top-down demands given to each school’s community during Bishop’s era.

Or it may even mean a re-evaluation of the enrichment program altogether, perhaps giving each school the leeway to decide for itself which programs it needs, wants and can afford.

Dissolving the current Del Mar Schools Education Foundation, with its blemished history and myopic vision, would be a drastic measure that carries with it a number of benefits. Let them take their marbles and go home. It’s time to stop the threats. This school district deserves better.

Many reasons why Del Mar Schools Education Foundation should not call it quits

Source: Carmel Valley News, April 24, 2008, Letters to the Editor

I am very saddened to see what has become of the Del Mar Schools Education Foundation. I know firsthand how difficult it is to volunteer for an organization in terms of fundraising, attending meetings and dealing with the community. I sat on the foundation board for nearly two years and silent auction committee that following year. I know that this current foundation has worked very hard and I commend all for that. I also think that there is a level of frustration out there right now that is being targeted toward the wrong group of people, the Del Mar Union School District Board of Trustees. This board did not create this difficult current situation. In fact, this problem of funding the foundation in a concurrent year began back in 2001-2002 when the past administration and Tom Bishop made a contract with the teachers union to supply the upper grade teachers with 180 min/week and the lower grade teachers 120min/week for on site school prep time.

When Tom realized this contract was to require that certificated teachers be in the classrooms and that teacher aides could no longer fill in for the certificated teachers for the allowed prep time, he was in a quandary as to how to fund this situation. Since the contract being signed had been agreed upon by Tom Bishop, the past board trustees and the Del Mar Union Teachers Union, the district had to find a way to fund these additional certificated teachers that were not budgeted for the coming year. The foundation was in the process of being formed with the idea of bringing in art, science and technology teachers district-wide. Instead of waiting for the following year to implement the foundation, Tom said it would be best to start the foundation for this current year. That is why the foundation has always run its fundraising for the same year. As for the funding issue it needs to be clear that this is not the fault of this current board.

As for the comments made in Bob Gans’ most recent letter stating that the donations have dropped off significantly since Tom’s resignation, has anyone looked to see just how in past years the months of February and March donations compare to this current year? Are they the same, more or less? I think it is very subjective to claim that they have dropped significantly since Tom resigned—significantly to what?

I know that the foundation refuses to say this is not apolitical move and it is acting in a non-biased way in its decision to request that the school boar accept the promised foundation decision for this current year, but then hold it until next year expecting the district to fund the entire ESC program for this year. When asked why did you do this now instead of waiting for the following September when everyone can be made aware of the new plan, you claim that people are angry and felt the foundation needed to do “something.” Being neutral and continuing down the path of fundraising without acknowledgement of these angry people is what this foundation should do. That would be doing something.

The decision that the board made regarding if a school meets its goal or not and can they hire a teacher if the goal is not met was not undermining the foundation. Any independent donation that is directed toward the district for a designated purpose needs to be utilized in the manner in which it was donated for. Since the PTA’s technically cannot legally donate money to a foundation as a pass-through, it or any Joe Blow can donate to the district for a specific purpose. That is just how it is and always has been. The board did not undermine the foundation; it just confirmed that is what has been done in the past.

I think this community just needs to take a deep breath and figure out how to get along and stop blaming each other. Maybe instead of calling it “quits,” the foundation should proceed with a low-key ask for next year. Once more positive information gets out into the community regarding the district and foundation the community will be more willing to donate. The foundation is now an integral part of this district. It would be shame to shut it down now. With the state of the economy and cutbacks staring at us in the face we may find this foundation can help the district get through this. It would take a lot of manpower in terms of time and money to reinstate this should the foundation decided to close. I guess we will find out at the May 6 board meeting.

- Corinne Hackbart

Wednesday, April 16, 2008

DMSEF Letter to the Superintendent

Source: http://delmarkids.org/docs/pdfs/DMSEF_Donation_Letter.pdf

Del Mar Schools Education Foundation

April 15, 2008

BY HAND
Ms. Janet Bernard
Interim Superintendent
Del Mar Union School District
225 9th Street
Del Mar, California 92014

Dear Janet:

On behalf of the Board of the Del Mar Schools Education Foundation, it is my pleasure to present you with the enclosed check for $522,920.20, which represents the gross amount raised, without deduction for any expenses, through our Annual Appeal to date. These funds are offered as restricted contributions, to be used for enrichment programs at the following schools, in the amounts indicated below:

Ashley Falls
Carmel Del Mar
Del Mar Heights
Del Mar Hills
Ocean Air
Sage Canyon
Sycamore Ridge
Torrey Hills
$62,877.80
$45,187.00
$78,875.00
$63,550.00
$68,005.00
$90,659.26
$52,925.00
$60,841.14

As noted in my April 2 letter to the Board of Trustees, the Foundation will turn over any additional funds raised through our Annual Appeal between now and the end of this month on May 1, and will contribute any additional surplus generated by our fundraising activities as soon as our budgeting process is complete.

I wish to thank our entire Board for their tireless work this year, as well as the hundreds of donors who made the presentation of this check possible. Please contact me if you have any questions.

Very truly yours,
/s/
Bob Gans
DMSEF President

Cc:
DMUSD Board of Trustees
DMUSD PTA Presidents
DMUSD School Principals
DMSEF Board Members

Del Mar Shores Property - Meeting Minutes

Source: http://delmar.ca.us/City/Meetings/CityCouncil/20080414.htm

Del Mar City Council Follow-Up
April 14, 2008
Del Mar Communications Center
240 Tenth Street, Del Mar, California

CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL - 6:05 p.m.

PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

Councilmember Hilliard led the Pledge of Allegiance.

COMMUNITY ANNOUNCEMENTS/PRESENTATIONS

ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (Non-Action Item) - None.

OLD BUSINESS

  1. Shores Property – 215/225 Ninth Street (Crawford/Hilliard).

    Action Taken: Council solicited public input and approved committing City resources to assist in the purchase of the Shores property to provide the fundraisers with additional time for their campaign. Council directed the Council subcommittee to continue to negotiate with the School District regarding their proposal.

    Deputy Mayor Crawford/Councilmember Hilliard: Continue to negotiate with the School District to close escrow of the Shores property by May 15, 2008.

    City Manager: Secure short term interim financing to provide the fundraisers with additional time for their campaign to purchase the property.

    Reference: Clerk’s File No. 702-1

ADJOURNMENT - 9:00 p.m.

Saturday, April 12, 2008

Del Mar Shores Property - Special Meeting

The City of Del Mar will be holding a special meeting to discuss possible revision of the terms of the purchase price of the DMUSD Shores property.

DATE:
TIME:
LOCATION:
 
Monday April 14, 2008
6:00 pm
Del Mar Communications Center
240 Tenth Street, Del Mar, CA

More information:

City of Del Mar
Memorandum

TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Members of the City Council
Deputy Mayor Crawford and Councilmember Carl Hilliard
April 14, 2008
Shores Property 215/225 Ninth Street

ISSUE:

Whether (1) to approve new terms for the purchase of the Del Mar Union School District (DMUSD) property (Shores), and (2) to use City resources, including borrowed funds or the sale of property, to assist in fundraising efforts.

RECQMMENDATION:

The City Council should consider the options presented here and, following public input and discussion, determine a) whether City resources should be used to assist in the fundraising efforts to purchase the Shores property, and b) whether the City should tentatively accept the School District's proposal to amend the terms of the Purchase Agreement.

FISCAL IMPACT:

Unless the purchase money for the Shores property is raised privately by community funds, the City could find its general fund and budget at risk.

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT:

CEQA review for the purchase of the Shores property was done previously. Various categorical exemptions apply. No review is required for the City's financing decision.

BACKGROUND:

On July 30, 2007, the City entered into an agreement with the Del Mar Union School District for the purchase of the Shores property. Among other things, the Purchase Agreement called for deposit into escrow the full purchase price of $8.5 million by February 28, 2008.

On August 6, 2007, by Resolution 2007-35, the City Council announced the acquisition of the Shores property and set forth the purpose of the acquisition and its intentions regarding the use of the Shores property. Resolution 2007-35 cited the City's inability to finance the acquisition and the Council's support for the joint fundraising efforts by the community and the Winston School, which fundraising efforts would make the purchase possible.

The first three benchmark payments required by the purchase agreement were made; however, fundraising efforts have fallen approximately $3.5 million short of the goal for the February 28 deadline. By letter dated February 19, the Campaign for Del Mar Shores presented a direct proposal to the School District to extend the deadline for escrow. Specifically, the Fundraisers sought additional 12-months to complete the fundraising effort. That proposal was not acceptable to the School District. The City and the District have since negotiated to extend the deadline and amend the terms of the Purchase Agreement.

Two extensions of the closing date have been granted by the School District, during which time the City and the District have discussed various options for amending the terms and conditions in the Purchase Agreement. The District's final extension of time to reach a tentative agreement on the amendment expires on April 15, 2008.

Recently, the District conveyed a proposal to the City that requires the City to close escrow not later than May 15, 2008. Upon the close of escrow, the City will deliver $5 million together with its promissory note for $3.5 million secured by the property, with monthly interest payments, and with periodic principal payments. The payment schedule would be as follows: $250,000 on August 15; $1.5 million on November 14; $250,000 on February 13, 2009 and the balance of $1.5 million and all accrued but unpaid interest on May 15, 2009. The District's proposal also requires the City to reimburse the District's legal and consultant costs relating to the amendment in an amount not to exceed $10,000 and to complete the execution of the Lease Agreement for the District's lease back of its administrative office space no later than May 9, 2008. The District's representatives have made it clear that no further extensions of the closing date (past May 15, 2008) will be granted.

Representatives from the fundraising committee, The Campaign for Del Mar Shores, and from the Winston School will provide the Council and the community with an update regarding the current status of the campaign and the total funds received and pledged at tonight's special meeting.

DISCUSSION:

As noted above, efforts to raise community funds for the_purchase of the Shores property have resulted in deposits to the escrow account totaling approximately $4.8 million. There remains, however, a shortfall of approximately $3.7 million required to fully fund the purchase price. Furthermore, additional funds must be raised to cover the loans made to the fundraising campaign as well as the costs of fundraising.

Given the May 15, 2008, deadline for closing escrow, the purchase of the Shores property can only be accomplished with assistance from the City. Such assistance might include short term financing secured by the City, which arrangement would give the Fundraisers additional time to raise the balance of the funds required. However, municipalities may not acquire real property by entering into installment sales contracts or mortgage agreements unless the total amount of the purchase price is paid in the year the property is acquired. The use of City-backed "bridge" financing, therefore, obligates the City's resources and could put the City's AA credit rating at risk. This risk must be carefully considered. Tonight's special meeting should include a discussion of the options available to the City in the event the fundraising efforts fall short of the funds necessary to satisfy the promissory note that would become due and payable in 12-months.

Options for consideration and discussion include the following:

  • sale of a portion of the Shores property
  • use of the City's open space funds - one time money (approximately $400,000)
  • use of interim financing (bank loan, commercial paper program, shortterm notes)
  • exchanging the Balboa lot for an equivalent portion of the Shores
  • property and liquidating the Balboa lot to help retire the City's indebtedness for the Shores purchase relocating City Hall to the School District administrative office site on the Shores property

Thursday, April 10, 2008

Del Mar school district faces several big decisions

Source: Carmel Valley News, April 10, 2008.

By Ian S. Port
Assistant Editor

The Del Mar Union School District faces an evening of wrestling with tough and important questions at its March 26 meeting (a day after presstime for this newspaper).

Its trustees must decide how to replace a recently resigned board member, whether to make a major shift in the funding of enrichment classes, and if comments made in the press by a board member violated bylaws.

The school board will also hear a report on the financial impacts of a recent decision to buy out the remainder of Superintendent Thomas Bishop’s contract, vote on another contract making Assistant Superintendent Janet Bernard his interim replacement, and begin deciding how to find a permanent leader in the wake of Bishop’s resignation one month ago.

The packed agenda for the March regular meeting illustrates the continuing reverberations of the Feb. 26 decision. Several of the biggest issues to be decided are directly or indirectly related to the departure of the superintendent.

Since then, trustee Linda Crawford has resigned, a tenuous recall campaign has begun against the majority of the board, and donations to the Del Mar Schools Education Foundation have dropped off, according to its president.

In her letter of resignation, Crawford did not specify Bishop’s ouster as her reason for resigning. Rather, she cited “philosophical differences,” and said the board should exercise its “fiduciary responsibilities … particularly with reference to the sale of the Shores property in Del Mar.”

Crawford was part of a unanimous vote to sell the 5-acre property to the city of Del Mar, but, when reached by phone, would not comment further on that issue.

“I found it extremely difficult and was compromising my beliefs in just working with this board,” Crawford said.

It is all but certain that the remaining four board members will vote to appoint a temporary replacement for Crawford, who was up for re-election in November. The district would have to wait until Nov. 4 to hold an election for a temporary replacement, leaving it with only four members for more than seven months.

“If we were to have an election that would essentially leave the seat vacant,” Board President Annette Easton said.

She said the board will likely issue a questionnaire allowing community members to nominate themselves for the temporary seat, then interview the candidates at a special meeting and vote to choose one. The candidate would be free to run for the permanent seat in the fall.

Less certain is the process for finding a permanent superintendent, though trustees have said they hope to hire one over the summer. The March agenda includes information about three search firms the district could use to help find a replacement for Bishop, and the group may vote to choose one and begin the process.

The board will likely ratify a contract for Assistant Superintendent of Curriculum Janet Bernard to take on duties as Interim Superintendent, a post she took days after Bishop’s departure.

It will also consider a report documenting the financial impacts to the district of the decision to end Bishop’s tenure early. Assistant Superintendent of Business Services Dena Whittington calculated the net cost the decision to the district at $262,383 over three fiscal years.

Under the agreement, Bishop would receive salary and health benefits through October 2009, totaling over $287,000.

Staff recommends that the district use a one-time payout of $255,946 to cover the costs remaining in the resignation agreement. That money is from unexpected, excess equity in the district’s worker’s compensation fund and is currently held in a special reserve account.

One issue likely to stimulate debate is a proposal from Del Mar Schools Education Foundation Chairman Bob Gans to change the current fundraising system, where the Foundation’s contributions to the district pay for enrichment teachers in the current year, to a system where the funds go toward the costs of the following year. The Foundation is due to make a $500,000 payment to the district for the costs of the enrichment program in May.

The immediate impact of the proposed change would be a $500,000 hit to the district’s general fund. But the shifting of fundraising to one year ahead has been a long-time goal of many in the district and foundation.

Yet the reason for the change request is rife with controversy. Gans says the Foundation has been hurting for donations since Bishop resigned, and that shifting funding focus to the next year would help assuage those who’ve withheld contributions in protest.

What influence the district has on Foundation donations is somewhat murky. Trustee Katherine White said it has to accept donations with whatever terms come attached.

“However they give us the money is how we’re going to accept and use the money,” White said. “It’s a gift to us and whatever restrictions they place on the gift, we’ll abide by them.”

Bernard, the interim chief of the district, agreed, saying the district’s reserves could afford such an impact this year, but not sustained into the future.

“We can’t tell them how they are to use the money,” said Bernard, who did not make a recommendation on the issue in a staff report. “Our reserves are healthy, so it is something that the board could consider at this time.”

While the district may have to respect earmarks on donations, in order for Gans’ proposal to defuse protests against the district to work as planned, the district must plan an arrangement for next year similar to the current one, where schools may raise money for their own sites only, and it must maintain the same number of standard enrichment teachers allocated to each school. Those decisions are up to the school board.

The board may also discuss — though is unlikely to take any action on — a complaint by group calling itself the “Concerned Citizens of the Del Mar Union School District” that trustee Katherine White violated board bylaws in statements she made in an article on the news Web site Voiceofsandiego.org about goings-on in the district.

The complaint, voiced in a letter with dozens of signatures, says White violated board bylaws of governing standards and the disclosure of confidential and privileged information.

Bernard said that no evidence of any of the events White referred to could be found in district files, so there are no grounds for punishing her for having disclosed confidential or privileged information.

But whether the statement violated governance standards for school boards was a matter of interpretation, and would have to be discussed by the board, Bernard said.

White said that there was no way to censure a member in the board’s bylaws.

“I don’t think it violated any bylaws,” White said. “But if we do think they violated a bylaw, we have no mechanism to do anything about it.”

Saturday, April 5, 2008

DMUSD Timeline For Board Appointment

Del Mar Union School District

TIMELINE FOR BOARD APPOINTMENT

2008

* updated

March 26 Board adopts timeline and application document for filling the vacancy on the Del Mar Union School District Governing Board
April 1 Application packet available to the public online (www.dmusd.org) or pick-up at the Del Mar Union School District, 225 9th Street, Del Mar.
April 1-15 District advertises vacancy in local newspapers
April 25 Deadline at 3:00 p.m. for all applications. They may be mailed, faxed or hand delivered to the District Office.
April 29 Copies of all applications mailed to Board members for review.
May 7 Special Board meeting at Ocean Air School to review applications and applicants in public and make the appointment. Each candidate will have five minutes to address the Board individually commencing at 3:15 p.m.

Related Documents:

  • Click here to download a Board Appointment Application that can be filled out and saved on your computer with the free Adobe Reader.

DMSEF Letter to the Trustees

Source: http://delmarkids.org/docs/pdfs/DMSEF_Letter_DMUSD_040208.pdf

Del Mar Schools Education Foundation

April 2, 2008

BY EMAIL
Dr. Annette Easton, President
Ms. Katherine White, Clerk
Dr. Janet Lamborghini
Mr. Steven McDowell
Board of Trustees
Del Mar Union School District
225 Ninth Street
Del Mar, California 92014

Dear Trustees:

On behalf of the entire board of the Del Mar Schools Education Foundation, I would like to thank the hundreds of donors who have supported our mission to support and enhance educational programs, and specifically enrichment programs, by contributing so generously to our annual appeal. Although our appeal will not end until the end of this month, we are mindful of the District’s May 1 deadline for accepting donations toward funding additional enrichment staffing positions for the 2008-09 school year, which you approved unanimously at your July 2007 meeting, and we are committed to helping each school secure its goal in the little time remaining.

Therefore, on April 15, 2008, the Foundation will deliver a check to the District for the gross amount raised and received to date through our annual appeal, without any deductions for any expenses associated with raising these funds (including credit card fees). The check, which will exceed $510,000, will be designated for “Enrichment Programs” at each individual school, in the amount raised on behalf of each school. This fulfills the promises that the Foundation has made throughout its current fundraising campaign that: (i) we would turn over all money raised through the annual appeal in advance of the May 1 deadline set by the DMUSD Board of Trustees; (ii) any dollars raised would be donated, without regard to the expenses associated with our fundraising efforts; and (iii) any donations designated for a particular school would stay at that school. Of course, we will continue to accept donations to our annual appeal through the end of the month, and we will turn over any additional amounts received, with the same designations as our April 15 contribution, as soon as possible. As soon as the Foundation completes its budgeting process for next year, we will also donate any available surplus as an additional sum, which also will be designated for “Enrichment Programs”, to be divided evenly amongst the individual schools.

We are pleased to be able to contribute these funds to benefit our children. Nevertheless, for all of the reasons stated in our March 6 letter (available on our website at www.delmarkids.org), and further stated at your March 26 meeting, we believe that our fundraising efforts have been hampered by the failure of the Board of Trustees to act upon the enrichment funding proposal submitted by the DMSEF. Further, the assurances given by a majority of individual trustees at the meeting that the District will accept donations for additional staffing positions at school sites beyond those allocated by the District, without regard to whether the particular site meets its fundraising goal, has further undermined our efforts by creating a disincentive to support these goals. These comments raise doubt regarding the necessity and desirability of maintaining a district-wide fundraising organization such as the Foundation. Therefore, the principal agenda item at our May 6, 2008 Board meeting will be to determine the feasibility of accomplishing our mission under the current environment, and whether it would be preferable to suspend our operations at the present time.

Very truly yours,
/s/
Bob Gans
DMSEF President

cc: Ms. Janet Bernard
Interim Superintendent

Friday, April 4, 2008

A Blast From The Past

Newly added: U-T articles from 1997 and 1998 relating to the departure of Tom Bishop's predecessor, Robert Harriman.